My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20040
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 20040
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:48:34 PM
Creation date
11/25/2008 3:20:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20040
Document_Title
Ordinance levying assessments for paving, curbs, gutters, sanitary and storm sewers on Lambert St. from Broadview St. to 350 feet west and 250 feet north; and declaring an emergency. (Contract 95-14) (Job #3207)
Adopted_Date
3/4/1996
Approved Date
3/4/1996
CMO_Effective_Date
3/4/1996
Signer
Ruth F. Bascom
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Hearing Minutes of February 13,199b <br />Job #3207 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Ms. Holbo also noted that the cemetery functioned as a park that was of a benefit to the City. <br />Scott Russell 3339 S. Lambert Street questioned whether the interest on an assessment of anon- <br />profitcemetery would apply to the amount of the unpaid assessment, The Hearings Official opined <br />that he believed that ORS 223.775~4~ requires that interest would accrue only on special burial plot <br />assessment account payments that were overdue. <br />Mr. Russell also wondered how an assessment is computed if a property owners frontage is less <br />than 60 feet. Mr. Klape stated that a minimum 64 foot frontage assessment is made. <br />Jon and Michaele Bonynbe wondered when the LID formation poll letter went out as they never <br />saw it. Mr. I~lope stated that the poll letter went out in April of 1994. The Bonynbe's <br />acknowledged that they didn't purchase their property until July of 1994 and that their realtor did <br />not inform them that their property might be subject to an improvement assessment. <br />Mr. Bonynbe wondered what option they had at this point and the Hearings Official informed him <br />that he could request in writing that the City Council not approve the assessment. <br />Mr. Russell questioned staff as to the formula used far dividing up project costs. Mr. Klope <br />indicated that the City would pay for intersection costs and a portion of drainage costs. <br />Mr. Russell also asked whether the project should have included a full concrete apron on property <br />accesses. Mr. Klope responded that staff did not believe that full concrete apron was required <br />where afull cut-de-sac was not present and a partially paved apron was an attempt to keep costs <br />down. He noted that a full concrete apron would cast $1,044 more than the partial gravellconcrete <br />apron constructed. <br />Receiving no further comments, the Hearings Official closed the public hearing at 6:56 p.m. The <br />Hearings Official notified those present that he was keeping the record open to receive the <br />following: <br />1. Additional information from staff demonstrating that the final assessment costs for sanitary <br />service are comparable to other projects of similar size and type. <br />~. Documentation that the Mulkey Cemetery Association is a licensed non profit corporation <br />with the State of Oregon. <br />3 . A response from the City Attorney regarding the City's interpretation of ORS 223.775 <br />RespectfuZiy Submitted, <br />ary . Darnielie <br />Eu ' e Hearing gfficiai <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.