Laserfiche WebLink
~'Pub~.ic and private facilities shall be designed and <br />located in a manner that preserves and enhances <br />desireable features of local and neighborhood areas and <br />,.. <br />~ ~.. promotes their sense of identity." <br />Conditions have been ~impased herein to particularly address the <br />desi n of this public facility to cause it to appropriately relate <br />q <br />to the historic buildings in the immediate vicinity consistent with <br />this policy. <br />Pvlic 33 of the Environmental Resources Element of the Metro Plan <br />Y <br />states a standard far design of transit facilities: <br />"Desi n of new street, highway, and transit facilities <br />g <br />shall consider noise mitigation measures where <br />appropriate," <br />Oise miti ation measures were considered in the design of this <br />N q <br />facilit and conditions imposed requiring implementation of <br />Y <br />mitigation measures. <br />The remainin language of the Metro Plan cited in apposition to the <br />g <br />re ested conditional use permit involves goals, objectives and <br />~ ~ in nature. These Include <br />policies which are aspirational <br />objectives and policies of the Residential Land Use and Housing <br />J <br />Element of the Metro Plan that are cited as being contrary to <br />a royal of this use. These generally are objectives,-palicies,ar <br />pp <br />Dols of an as irational nature intended tv encourage residential <br />g p <br />develo went. Obje-dive 5, included in those cited, does state a <br />P <br />poss~.ble standard. That objective provides: <br />"Protect existing and proposed residential areas from <br />conflicting nonresidential land uses while providing far <br />com atible and functional mixed~-use development <br />p . ~ t~ <br />~ resldent~,al and nonres~.dentlal } . <br />As with other onions of the Residential Element of the Metro Flan <br />P <br />cited b v Qnents, the opponents raa~e the assumption that the <br />~', pp or conf 1 icts with the. <br />lacatlon of the use is ~.nconsistent with <br />residential use. The findings herein are to the contrary. Also, <br />' t is noted that the area proposed for this development is not 14 a <br />residential area's within the normal meaning of that term and as <br />that term is construed here. The policy, therefore, is not <br />applicable. <br />a licant's initial statement contains a number of goals and <br />The, pp <br />olicles of the Metro Plan with which the location of this use <br />P <br />under the conditions im osed and at this site is consistent. I do <br />p <br />of construe those statements of policy to be criteria or standards <br />n <br />for approval here, however. <br />19 -- FINDINGS OF HEARINGS OFFICIAL CCU 94--3 } -- <br />