CCAgenda-4/12/04Mtg - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3. PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance Amending the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan Diagram and the Fairmount/University of Oregon Special Area Study Diagram and Text; Amending Section 9.5700 of the Eugene Code, 1971; Adding New Sections 9.4200, 9.4205, 9.4210, 9.4215, and 9.4220 to that Code; Adopting a Sever- ability Clause; and Providing an Effective Date. Allen Lowe of the Planning Division explained that the University of Oregon had recently completed a process to update its East Campus Development Policy, an element of its long-range development plan. He said the University was seeking the necessary land use approvals, which included amendments to the Metro Plan Diagram, the Fairmount/University of Oregon Special Study, and to Chapter 9 of the Eugene City Code. He stated that the Metro Plan amendment would redesignate land, now zoned high-density residential (HDR), medium-density residential (MDR), and low-density residential (LDR) to Government and Education. He stated that proposed amendments to the Fairmount/University of Oregon Special Area Study include plan policy, plan text, and land use diagram changes, expanding the area designated for institutional use in the plan and the creation of a new land-use category called limited high density residential/limited institutional. He said the proposed amendment to the Eugene Code would create a new overlay zoning category called the East Campus Overlay Zone, which would establish a height limit for uses in the identified transition area to help mitigate the impacts of institutional development on nearby residents. Mr. Lowe stated that, since February 17, letters had been received on the matters before the hearing from the following people: Sally Weston, Emily Toomey, Fred and Saundra Austin, and John Mosely, from the office of the Vice President and Provost of the University of Oregon. Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. Steve Gab, 1818 Villard Street, thanked the council for its service to the community. He thanked the University of Oregon for stepping up and negotiating with the neighborhood and he thanked, in particular, Kristen Taylor and Jeff Nelson for their work on behalf of the neighborhood association. He likened the situation the neighbors had faced to a frog in the boiling water that does not know when to jump out. He noted that a number of years prior, a planned unit development (PUD) had been put in a few houses away from his residence. At that time he felt a few more cars down his alley and street would not make a difference. Since then, he said, the University built its new Law School and a new Child Care Center. He conveyed his chief concern that traffic and parking mitigation had not occurred. He asserted that, while the City may believe that Agate Street has the capacity for increased traffic, the neighborhood does not. He felt this to be an opportunity for the City to be proactive and prevent the sorts of problems other neighborhoods adjacent to the campus area had experienced. Mary Ann Holser, 2620 Cresta de Ruta Drive, conveyed her thanks to the people who had worked on the mediation process. She was in general agreement with the proposed plan and its amendments. She asked that historic dwellings be preserved, calling them an asset to the City. Ms. Holser advocated for prioritization of the two recommended traffic studies. She asserted that Agate Street did not function as an arterial, causing through traffic to use adjacent streets. She felt pedestrian overpasses by the dormitories would "look beautiful" and solve the problem. She suggested funding for such a project come from a partnership of the University and the City, noting that the Public Works Department could use gas tax moneys that were unaffected by Ballot Measure 30 or other State cutbacks. Ms. Holser expressed concern that allowing the University to have a PUD on three adjacent lots could