Laserfiche WebLink
<br />On October 29, 2003, council held a work session on the Downtown Space Plan, focusing specifically on the <br />need for a new Police services building. Council directed staff to bring recommendations back on the <br />preliminary planning, cost and financing of a new Police Services building. Several councilors asked for more <br />information on how a new Police building would fit with future plans to replace City Hall, and for development <br />of a more general “civic center” concept. <br /> <br />On November 17, 2003, staff presented the Multi-Year Financial Plan to the Budget Committee. This plan <br />identified both the capital and operating needs for the entire organization over a six-year period. The police <br />building was listed as a high priority need in the MYFP, and replacement of City Hall was also included as a <br />future project. <br /> <br />On November 19, 2003, council held a work session on sequencing of financial measures to be presented to the <br />voters. The staff materials indicated that a bond measure for a police building would be the next potential item <br />to be presented to voters in November 2004. Council discussed the materials, but did not provide any direction <br />or make any decisions at the work session. <br /> <br />On February 25, 2004, council held an informational work session on the Civic Center Design Charrette and the <br />Mayor’s Civic Facilities Visioning Committee. On April 28, 2004, a work session was held to update council <br />on the Mayor’s Civic Facilities Visioning Committee and on financing plan options, borrowing methods and <br />construction methods that could be applied to a new police facility. On June 16, 2004, council reviewed the <br />report of the Mayor’s committee and asked that a public hearing be held on the proposed policy principles that <br />would guide future Civic Center development. A public information session was held on July 8 and the public <br />hearing on July 12. <br /> <br />On July 14, 2004, council held a work session on the Civic Facilities Visioning Committee Report and adopted a <br />revised set of Civic Center policy principles. They also determined that a City Hall and Police Building would <br />th <br />be located on City-owned property on 8 Avenue. <br /> <br />On July 21, 2004, council continued discussion of a potential bond measure for the November 2004 ballot. The <br />council directed the City Manager to develop a resolution to place a measure on the ballot based on an option <br />that would combine near-term space needs with modest Civic Center amenities. On July 26, 2004 council <br />placed a $6.79 million bond measure on the November 2004 ballot. The measure was to fund social service <br />th <br />agency space, police expansion space, improvements to the parks blocks, and improvements to make 8 Avenue <br />a “Civic Street”. On November 2, 2004, voters rejected ballot measure 20-88 by a margin of 60% to 40%. <br /> <br />On November 22, 2004, council approved the transfer of $15.4 million into the Facility Replacement Reserve <br />and agreed, in concept, to move forward with a master planning and public participation process for the purpose <br />of informing future decisions related to City Hall and/or a Public Safety Building. On SB #1 on December 8, <br />council approved the budget actions to make these transfers. <br /> <br />On May 25, 2005, council approved the City Hall/Police Building Priority Issue Action Plan which identified <br />the major policy issues to be addressed, the overall description of project phasing, the nature of work to be <br />accomplished, resource needs and proposed project outcomes. Council approved the allocation of up to $50,000 <br />from the Facility Replacement Reserve to implement Phase One of the action plan. <br /> <br />On September 12, 2005, a public hearing was held to give the citizens of Eugene an opportunity to offer sugges- <br />tions on a master planning process related to City Hall and associated City facilities, and identify issues to be <br />addressed as the City plans for its future downtown facilities needs. Several people addressed the council at the <br />hearing and several more people have subsequently submitted written comments on the subject of City Hall <br />master planning. <br /> <br />L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M051019\S051019A.doc <br />