My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Ordinance Concerning Goal 5 Natural Resources Study
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 10/24/05 WS
>
Item B: Ordinance Concerning Goal 5 Natural Resources Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:14:46 PM
Creation date
10/21/2005 9:25:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/24/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />505 U.S. 1039 <br /> <br />LUCAS v. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL <br />, Cite as 112 S.Ct. 2886 (1992) <br /> <br />2905 <br /> <br />area is notoriously unstable. In roughly half <br />of the last 40 years, all or part of petitioner's <br />property was part of the beach or flooded <br />twice daily by the ebb and flow of the tide. <br />'fr. 84. Between 1957 and 1963, petitioner's <br />property wasunder water. Id., at 79, 81~. <br />Between 1963 and 1973 the shoreline was 100 <br />to 150 feet onto petitioner's property. Ibid. <br />In 1973 the f1l'St line of stable vegetation was <br />about halfway through the property. Id., at <br />This effort did not stop the loss of shore- 80. Between 1981 and 1983, the Isle of <br />line. In October 1986, the Council appointed Palms issued 12 emergency orders for <br />a "Blue Ribbon Committee on Beachfront ..hgsgsandbagging to protect property in the <br />Management" to investigate beach erosion Wild Dune development. Id., at 99. Deter- <br />an~propose possible solutions. In March mining that local habitable strnctures were in <br />1987, the Committee found that South Car- imminent danger of collapse, the Council is- <br />olina's beaches were "critically eroding," and sued permitS for two rock revetments to <br />proposed land-use restrictions. Report of protect condominiuni developments near pe~ <br />the South Carolina Blue Ribbon Committee titioner's property from erosion; one of the <br />on Beachfront Management i, 6-10 (Mar. revetments extends more than halfway onto <br />1987). In response, South Carolina enacted one of his lots. Id., at 102. <br />the Beachfront Management Act on July l, <br />1988. S.C. Code Ann. ~ ~9-250 et seq. <br />(Supp.1990). The 1988 Act did not change <br />the uses permitted within the designated <br />critical areas. Rather, it enlarged those ar- <br />eas to encompass the distance from the mean <br />high watermark to a setback line established <br />on the basis of "the best scientffic and histOr- <br />ical data" available.! S.C.Code Ann. ~ 48- <br />39-280 (Supp.1991). <br /> <br />South Carolina began implementing the <br />congressional directive by enactirig the South <br />Carolina Coastal Zone Management Act of <br />1977. Under the 1977 Act, any construction <br />activity in what was designated the "critical <br />area" required a permit from the South Car- <br />olina qoastal Council (Council), and the con- <br />structionof any habitable structure was pro- <br />hibited. The 1977 critical area was relatively <br />narrow. <br /> <br />B <br /> <br />Petitioner Lucas is a contractor, manager, <br />and part owner of the Wild Dune develop- <br />ment on the Isle of Palms. He has lived <br />there since 1978. In December 1986, he <br />purchased two of the last four pieces of <br />vacant property jn the development.3 The <br /> <br />they are often driven. like battering rams, into <br />adjacent inland homes." Ibid. Moreover, the <br />development often destroys the natural sand <br />dune barriers that provide stonn breaks. Ibid. <br /> <br />2. The setback line was determined by calculating <br />the distance landward from the crest of an ideal <br />oceanfront sand dune which is 40 times the <br />annual erosion rate. S.C.Code Ann. ~ 48-39- <br />, 280 (Supp.1991). <br /> <br />C <br /> <br />The South Carolina Supreme Court found <br />that the Beachfront Management Act did not <br />take petitioner's property without compensa- <br />tion. , The decision rested on, two premises <br />that until today were unassailable-that, the <br />State has the power to prevent any use of <br />property it finds to be harmful to its citizens, <br />and that a state statute is entitled tQ a <br />presumption of constitutionality. <br /> <br />The Beachfront Management Act includes <br />a finding by the South Carolina General As- <br />sembly that the beach/dune system serves <br />the purpose of "protect[ing] life and property <br />by serving as a storm barrier which dissi- <br />pates wave energy and contributes to shore- <br />" <br /> <br />3. The properties were sold frequently at rapidly <br />escalating prices before Lucas purchased them. <br />Lot 22 was first sold in '1979 for $96.660, sold. in <br />1984 fQr, $187,500, then in 1985 for $260,000, <br />and, finally, to Lucas in 1986' for $475,000. He <br />estimated its worth in 1991 at $650.000. Lot 24 <br />had a similar'past. The record does not indicate <br />who purchased the properties prior to Lucas. or <br />why none of the purchasers held on to the lots <br />and built on them, Tr. 44-46. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.