My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Public Safety Task Force Update
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 11/09/05 WS
>
Item B: Public Safety Task Force Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:15:48 PM
Creation date
11/4/2005 8:22:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/9/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />II <br /> <br />Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Public Safety Task Force met seven times between June 30 and September 28. They heard <br />testimony from a number of citizens, received a large volume of information from city elected <br />officials and from Lane County public safety staff, and debated issues for a number of hours. <br /> <br />At the beginning of the decision-making process, the Task Force decided that eachjurisdiction <br />(12 cities and the county) would have one vote, for a total of 13 possible votes. They also <br />decided that the District Attorney and the Sheriff could be active participants in the debate and <br />would have a chance to weigh-in on each motion prior to a vote by the Task Force. <br /> <br />The Task Force decided that a "supermajority" of about 80 percent of jurisdictions would be <br />necessary in order to pass a recommendation on to the Board of Commissioners. For example, <br />on September 8, there were 12 jurisdictions present and the group decided that it would take 1 0 <br />affirmative votes for a motion to pass. <br /> <br />The conclusions and recommendations of the Public Safety Task Force are in four areas: Focus, <br />Goals, Programs and Services to Achieve Goals, and Financing Programs and Services. Each of <br />these is discussed next. <br /> <br />Focus <br /> <br />Recommendation: The Task Force recommends that, for at least the next jive years, Lane <br />County's public safety system shouldfocus its efforts on illegal drugs and alcohol abuse. <br /> <br />Explanation: The use of illegal drugs and abuse of alcohol-and predominantly <br />methamphetamine-is without doubt the single most important factor associated with criminal <br />behavior and frequent interaction with the public safety system. No matter what part of the <br />system is analyzed-police services, prosecution, the courts, corrections, parole and probation, <br />child welfare, the juvenile justice system, or mental health programs-drug and alcohol use <br />always seem to be present" Li,:,~s are being ruined, innocent people are being victimized every <br />day,~and the system is spending millions and millions of dollars each year trying to keep up. <br /> <br />Goals <br /> <br />Recommendation: Given the focus on illegal drugs and the abuse of alcohol, the Task Force <br />recommends that, for at least the next jive years, Lane County's public safety system should <br />concentrate on achieving the followingfour goals, all related to drugs and alcohol: <br /> <br />. Target these Groups for Special Action: illegal Drug Producers, Dealers, and Users and <br />Target Property Criminals <br />. Reduce Family Violence <br />. Enhance Treatment Programs <br />. Provide Prevention Programs <br /> <br />Executive Summary - Lane County Public Safety Task Force Final Report <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.