My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: I-5 Franklin Proposed Interchange Project Update
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 11/14/05 WS
>
Item C: I-5 Franklin Proposed Interchange Project Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:19:03 PM
Creation date
11/10/2005 8:18:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/14/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENGINEERING/ENVIRONMENTAL AND COST ANALYSIS: <br />I-5 WILLAMETTE RIVER CROSSING/GLENWOOD FACILITY PLAN PHASE II <br />Table 1 <br />Engineering and Environmental Constraints and Impacts Summary <br />Category Concept Name <br />Engineering/Environmental Comments <br />Constraints/Impacts <br />1Full Interchange: Park, river and wetland impacts with Most of interchange would be <br />Diamond 1bridge piers for north ramps, supported by a series of bridges. <br />transmission line impacts.High cost solution with natural <br />environment impacts. <br />Full Interchange: Similar to Diamond 1 with a larger Similar to Diamond 1, but higher <br />Diamond 2 footprint and greater impacts cost and more natural and <br />including impacts to industrial human/built environment impacts. <br />parcels in southeast quadrant. <br />Full Interchange: Park, river and wetland impacts Reduced impacts to natural <br />Partial Cloverleaf minimized (relative to other Category environment than other Category 1 <br />1 concepts), but introduces impacts concepts, with greater impacts to <br />to Laurel Hill neighborhood and human/built environment. <br />requires larger parcels of industrial <br />land in southeast quadrant. Impacts <br />to transmission lines on both sides of <br />I-5. <br />2Partial Interchange: This is the north half of Diamond 1 Similar to Diamond 1, with on- and <br />Partial Diamond with similar park, river and wetland off-ramps in the river. <br />impacts with bridge piers and <br />transmission line impacts <br />Partial Interchange: Similar to Category 1 Partial Has fewer river/natural resource <br />Partial Cloverleaf Cloverleaf concept with similar impacts than other partial <br />impact to the Laurel Hill interchange forms. Has fewer built <br />neighborhood and less impact to environment impacts than the <br />industrial area in the southeast Category 1 Partial Cloverleaf form. <br />quadrant due to elimination of ramps <br />3 <br />Split Interchange: Similar constraints/impacts as Relatively few additional impacts <br />Two ½ Diamonds Category 2 concepts, with the associated with the Glenwood <br />addition of the Glenwood ramps that improvements. <br />impact industrial area along the <br />north/east side of the freeway. <br />Split Interchange: Includes additional impacts from The terrain between Franklin Blvd. <br />Connected collector/distributor (CD) roads and Glenwood rises and falls <br />Diamonds between the split diamonds. CD steeply on both sides of the <br />roads would impact the Laurel Hill freeway. Accurate topographic <br />neighborhood and Laurel Grove data and the development of <br />Cemetery, requiring retaining walls engineering drawings are <br />and transmission line necessary to better assess impacts <br />relocations/adjustments on both <br />sides of freeway. <br />4 <br />Glenwood The footprint of this alternative is The Glenwood interchange lies in <br />Interchange more contained and avoids many of an area of steep terrain and is <br />Diamond the potential impacts (river, rail, therefore less developed and has <br />Laurel Hill neighborhood) of the other fewer natural resources (e.g., <br />categories. There are potential waterways and wetlands). <br />impacts to the cemetery and some <br />impacts to transmission lines. Large <br />retaining walls would be required. <br />PDX\052200014 6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.