Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Code Amendment <br /> <br />9.8065 Code Amendment Aooroval Criteria. If the city council elects to act, it may, by <br />ordinance, adopt an amendment to this land use code that: <br />(1) Is consistent with applicable statewide planning goals as adopted by the <br />Land Conservation and Development Commission. <br /> <br />Goal] - Citizen Involvement. To develop a citizen involvement program that insures <br />the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process. <br /> <br />The City has acknowledged provisions for citizen involvement which insure the opportunity for <br />citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process and set out requirements for such <br />involvement. The action taken did not amend the citizen involvement program. The process for <br />adopting these amendments complied with Goal 1 since it complied with, and surpassed the <br />requirements of, the citizen involvement provisions. Specifically, the following actions were <br />taken to insure adequate citizen participation in the project: <br /> <br />· Pro;ect Notification: Staff provided notification of the project to both the Jefferson <br />Westside and Far West neighborhood organizations through newsletter articles prior to <br />the project's commencement. This was followed by a project-specific newsletter to all <br />property owners, residents and tenants within the Chambers Study area announcing the <br />project and the first project meeting. The notices were mailed to more than 1700 <br />addresses within the study area as well as to several hundred other interested parties who <br />live outside of the study area but who requested notification. <br />. Pro;ect Newsletters Following the initial newsletter mailing, project newsletters were <br />mailed to all 1700 addresses in the study area prior to the October and November general <br />meetings. After the November meeting, newsletters were mailed only to those who had <br />attended previous meetings and others who had requested that their names be placed on <br />the project notification list. <br />. BackJ!round Information. Maps and Pro;ect Information. All background maps <br />produced for the 1998 Existing Conditions Report were updated to show current <br />conditions for each factor mapped. All tables and text in the report were evaluated for <br />currency and were updated where necessary. The full Existing Conditions Report and a <br />Summary of the full report were made available to the public prior to the first meeting. <br />. Bicvcle Tour. On October 19, just before conducting the Neighborhood Design <br />Preferences Survey, staff and consultants joined about 20 area residents for a bike tour of <br />the neighborhood. We began by following the tour map but responded to participants <br />suggestions to view other buildings that were not on the tour route. <br />. NeiJ!hborhood Meetings. Five general neighborhood meetings were held; one each in <br />September, October and November and two in April. Meeting attendance grew from <br />about 20 to nearly 50 participants by November and remained fairly constant throughout <br />the remainder of the project. The September neighborhood meeting was held to explain <br />the project, field questions and stimulate discussion; the October and November meetings <br />were dedicated to conducting and translating the Neighborhood Design Preferences <br /> <br />Exhibit A - 9 <br />