Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit A to Administrative Order No. 44-23-01-F <br />City of Eugene Public Contracting Rules 2022 – Part 2 Page 112 <br /> <br />project in question, or the ability to secure necessary financial measures to effectively <br />guarantee energy savings under an ESPC for that project. <br />16) Savings has the meaning set forth in ORS 279C.337(4), pertaining to CM/GC Services <br />procurements. For other Alternative Contracting Methods, “Savings” means a positive <br />difference between a Guaranteed Maximum Price or other maximum not-to-exceed price set <br />forth in a Public Improvement Contract and the actual cost of the Contractor’s performance <br />of the Contract Work payable by the Contracting Agency under the terms of the Contract, <br />including costs for which a Contracting Agency reimburses a Contractor and fees, profits or <br />other payments the Contractor earns. <br />17) Technical Energy Audit means, as used in ESPC Procurement, the initial phase of Personal <br />Services to be performed by an ESCO that includes a detailed evaluation of an existing <br />building or structure, an evaluation of the potential ECMs that could be effectively utilized at <br />the facility, and preparation of a report to the Contracting Agency of the ESCO's Findings <br />during this initial phase of the Work; the term "Technical Energy Audit" can also refer to the <br />report provided by the ESCO at the conclusion of this phase of the Work. <br />Related State Statutes: ORS 279A.065, 279C.332, & 279C.335 <br /> <br /> <br />137-049-0620. Use of Alternative Contracting Methods <br />1) Competitive Bidding Exemptions. ORS Chapter 279C requires a competitive bidding <br />process for Public Improvement Contracts, unless a statutory exception applies, a class of <br />Contracts has been exempted from the competitive bidding process, or an individual <br />Contract has been exempted from the competitive bidding process, in accordance with <br />279C.335 and any applicable Contracting Agency administrative rules. Use of Alternative <br />Contracting Methods may be directed by the Contracting Agency if that use is within the <br />competitive bidding process, if feasible, or through an available statutory exception to the <br />competitive bidding process. Use of Alternative Contracting Methods must be directed <br />through a Contracting Agency's Contract Review Authority, however, when use of the <br />Alternative Contracting Method requires an exemption to the prescribed competitive bidding <br />requirement of 279C.335. In any of these circumstances, use of Alternative Contracting <br />Methods must be justified in accordance with any applicable Code and Contracting Agency <br />requirements and, if required, these 137-049-0600 to 137-049-0690 Rules. See Rule 137- <br />049-0630 regarding required Findings and restrictions on exemptions from the competitive <br />bidding requirement under ORS 279C.335. <br />2) Energy Savings Performance Contracts. ESPCs are excepted from the competitive bidding <br />requirements for Public Improvement Contracts pursuant to ORS 279C.335(1)(f), if the <br />Contracting Agency complies with the procedures set forth in Rules 137-049-0600 to 137- <br />049-0690 or parallel administrative rules meeting the requirements of ORS 279A.065 related <br />to the solicitation, negotiation and contracting for ESPC Work. If those procedures are not <br />followed, an ESPC procurement may still be exempted from competitive bidding <br />requirements by following the general exemption procedures within 279C.335. <br />3) Post-Project Evaluation. ORS 279C.355 requires that the Contracting Agency prepare a <br />formal post-project evaluation of Public Improvement projects in excess of $100,000 when <br />the Contracting Agency does not use the competitive bidding process required by 279C.335. <br />The purpose of this evaluation is to determine whether it was actually in the Contracting <br />Agency's best interest to use an Alternative Contracting Method outside the competitive <br />bidding process. The evaluation must be delivered to the Contracting Agency's Contract <br />Review Authority within 30 Days of the date the Contracting Agency "accepts" the Public <br />Improvement project, which event is typically defined in the Contract. In the absence of such