Laserfiche WebLink
<br />topography and the lack of a stonn system necessary to rid the area of standing water. The old <br />wastewater line was located within the alley and was originally constructed in 1914. The wastewater <br />pipe was in very poor condition. This project replaced the wastew:iter pipe with new pipe, added a <br />stonn system including a water quality structure, and resurfaced the alley with Portland Cement <br />Concrete bringing it up to City standards as described in the City Code and the Public Improvement <br />Designs Standards manual. <br /> <br />ASSESSMENTS <br /> <br />Costs were distributed per Eugene Code 7.175, and outlined in the Council adopted Hearings Official <br />findings and recommendations, and resolution forming the LID <br /> <br />Below are the final assessable unit costs: <br /> <br />Ie <br /> <br />Unit Assessable Cost (per front foot) <br />Unit Assessable Cost (per square foot) <br /> <br />$ <br />$ <br /> <br />8.95 <br />.0639 <br /> <br />Total Assessable Cost (for weighted frontage) <br />Total Assessable Cost (for weighted areas) <br />Direct Assessment <br /> <br />$ 59,796.24 <br />$ 59,796.22 <br />$ 1,084.24 <br /> <br />Total Assessable Cost <br />Total City Cost <br />. Total Project Cost <br /> <br />$120,676.70 <br />$ 55,468.10 <br />$176,144.80 <br /> <br />The final assessable costs are higher than estimated when the LID was formed. The increase in <br />assessable costs came about because of increased paving costs for the alley and a direct assessment. <br />The direct assessment is for a property owner requesting specific work outside the scope of the alley <br />improvement. The property owner agreed to pay for the work and the contractor was willing to do the <br />work while they were on-site. Additional increases were also a result of additional pavement that was <br />installed along the alley. After consultation with the property owners, the alley pavement was widened <br />and thickened to respond to the conditions discovered in the transition to private property. <br /> <br />Based on the low bid received, the costs listed below are the estimated assessment costs plus <br />contingency calculated at the time of the formation of the LID. <br /> <br />Unit Assessable Cost (per front foot) <br />Unit Assessable Cost (per square foot) <br /> <br />$ 8.20 <br />$ 0.0586 <br /> <br />Total Assessable Cost (for weighted frontage) <br />Total Assessable Cost (for weighted ~reas) <br /> <br />$ 54,810.00 <br />$ 54,810.00 <br /> <br />Total Estimated Assessable Cost <br />Total Estimated City Cost <br /> <br />$109,620.00 <br />$ 59,970.00 <br />