Laserfiche WebLink
FIl~D.TNGS IN SI~PPORT OF MGRATORIUM GN <br />LAND USE AND BUILDING PERMITS FGR <br />TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES <br />GENERAL FINDINGS <br />~VEW APPLICATIQNSJ' <br />1. In February 1996, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 the "Act"} became law. <br />The Act is designed to reduce regulatory barriers and encourage competition among all types <br />of telecommunications providers. The Act, however, also expressly preserves local zoning <br />authority over wireless telecommunications facilities, such as antennas and towers used for <br />cellular or personal communication services ~"PCS "}. Among the provisions of the Act is <br />Section 704, which added 47 U.S.C. ~ 332~c}~7}, entitled "Preservation of Local Zoning <br />Authority. " Section 704 expressly allows local zoning regulations as long a5 they do not <br />unreasonably discriminate among equivalent services and do not prohibit or have the effect of <br />prohibiting service. <br />Z. Over the past several years, even before the Act's passage and its removal of <br />regulatory barriers, a host of new wireiess telecommunications technologies have been <br />developed. Telecommunications services include paging service, cellular telephone service, and <br />PCS . All of these wireiess technologies require, to varying degrees, either the construction of <br />transmitting equipment placed on towers} or receiving equipment such as antennas}, or both. <br />The growth of these services could result in a proliferation of new telecommunication towers and <br />receivers throughout the City's landscape -- far more than exist under alder technologies such <br />as radio telephone service and existing cellular and paging services. <br />3. According to recent articles in the Washington Post and The wall Street Journal, <br />the number of cellular and PCS antennas, for example, could grow by more than six times -- <br />from 1S,0o0 nationwide to 115,000 -- by the end of the decade. Several new PCS companies <br />already have contacted the City to inquire about constructing towers in this area. In addition <br />to the new PCS providers made possible by the Act, cellular providers also are likely to seek <br />installation of more antennas and towers to expand their services. <br />4. The City is likely to eventually have as many as five or six PCS-type providers. <br />PCS "cells" maybe .5 to 2 miles in diameter versus 3 -15 miles for conventional cellular. One <br />major PCS venture has proposed for another city} one tower every two square miles. If each <br />provider sited its facilities independently, six PCS-type providers could result in approximately <br />3 separate towers per square mile -- each So' to 150' tall. The size of Eugene exceeds 40 <br />square miles, potentially resulting in more than loo towers. Testimony from the public hearing <br />suggested that this number was calculated incorrectly. That testimony assert that correct <br />calculations would produce a number of only 12.7 towers or sites er rovider. Even if this is <br />true, the same testimony acknowledges that there may be six providers, resulting in more than <br />75 towers or sites. More importantly, the testimony ignored the basis for the calculation ~i.e., <br />one tower every two square miles}, and assumed, instead, a "ce11" two miles in diameter. <br />5. It is technologically possible far cellular, PCS and specialized mobile radio <br />EXHI@IT <br />-1- <br />