My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20074
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 20074
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:48:53 PM
Creation date
1/12/2009 12:35:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20074
Document_Title
An ordinance levying assessments for construction of sidewalks and driveways approaches for five (5) various locations in the City; and declaring an emergency. (Contract 95-26) (Job #3375)
Adopted_Date
12/2/1996
Approved Date
12/2/1996
CMO_Effective_Date
12/2/1996
Signer
Ruth F. Bascom
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
landscaping done. Mr. Lankston explained that this cost was related to the removal of the <br />trees that were growing on the right-of way. Mr. Lankston agreed that the sidewalk and <br />wall construction were expensive. This relatively high cost was the result of the project <br />involving several sidewalks in different parts of town, and that the property owners had <br />been warned about that before the project was initiated. Mr. Smith stated that he did not <br />understand why there had been no further contact once the project was started. Mr. <br />Lankston explained that once the property owner had chosen to not make the <br />improvement and the city had initiated the work, there was no need for further discussion <br />because all of the decisions had been engineering decisions related to the need to have a <br />sidewalk constructed that conformed to the building standards that the City was required <br />to follow. <br />After Mr. Smith renewed his objection to the cost of the wall, and the reasoning <br />that led to decision that the wall was necessary, the hearing concluded at 6:40. <br />Minutes -LID Final Assessment Hearing November 13,1996 Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.