Laserfiche WebLink
Existing Development Proposed Development Impact of Chan e <br />g <br />. <br />Cr~ter~a Cr~ter~a <br />1. Prior to adoption of this 1. Prior to adoption of this Plan, Addition of the phrase "or <br />Plan, the site has an approved or prior to inclusion of site in prior to inclusion of site in <br />wetland impact permit from this Plan, the site has an this Plan" allows more sites <br />the aregon Division of State approved wetland impact permit to meet this criterion since it <br />Lands and U. S. Army Corps of from the Oregon Division of includes sites that received <br />Engineers, or an approved State Lands and U. S. Army approvals after plan <br />Final Environmental Impact Corps of Engineers, or an adoption, but before <br />Statement approved Final Environmental incorporation of the site into <br /> Impact Statement which the plan. This change favors <br /> justifies fill and development of development somewhat, but <br /> the site. reflects the intent of the <br /> existing plan. Addition of <br /> the phrase "which justifies <br /> f 11 and development of the <br /> site" restricts those sites with <br /> approved EIS to thane where <br /> fill and development is <br /> justified in the EIS. <br /> However, a project requiring <br /> an EIS which did not justify <br /> f 11 and development would <br /> not be constructed, so this <br /> would essentially have no <br /> impact. <br />2. The site is relatively 2. Site is relatively isolated or No change. <br />isolated or disconnected from disconnected from the larger <br />the larger system of wetlands system of wetlands and <br />and waterways. waterways, <br />Policy Amendments G~dinance, .Exhibit B (Statewide Planning Goal Findings} page ~ <br />