Ordinance No. 20126 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Existing Development Proposed Development Impact of Change Criteria Criteria I. Prior to adoption of this 1. Prior to adoption of this Plan, Addition of the phrase "or Plan, the site has an approved or prior to inclusion of site in prior to inclusion of site in wetland impact permit from this Plan, the site has an this Plan" allows more sites the Oregon Division of State approved wetland impact permit to meet this criterion since it Lands and U.S. Army Corps of from the Oregon Division of includes sites that received Engineers, or an approved State Lands and U.S..Army approvals after plan Final Environmental Impact Corps of Engineers, or an adoption, but before Statement approved Final Environmental incorporation of the site into Impact Statement which the plan. This change favors justif es fill and development of develapment somewhat, but the site. reflects the intent of the existing plan. Addition of the phrase "which justif es fill and development of the site" restricts those sites with approved EIS to those where fill and development is justified in the EIS. However, a project requiring an EIS which did not justify fill and development would not be constructed, so this would essentially have no impact. 2. The site is relatively 2. Site is relatively isolated or No change. isolated or disconnected from disconnected from the larger the larger system of wetlands system of wetlands and and waterways. waterways, 3. The site is served by 3, Site is served by existing No change. existing streets, roads, streets, roads, sanitary sewers sanitary sewers and and municipal water municipal water 4. The site is adjacent to or 4. Site is adjacent to or No change. surrounded by existing surrounded by existing development development 5. The site has frontage on a 5, Site has frontage on a major No change. ma j or highway or street. highway or street. Policy Amendments Qrdinance, Exhibit B (Statewide Planning Goal Findings} Page g