Ordinance No. 20133 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

with public service announcements. Flyers providing notice of the Se tember 16 initiation meetin p g were also posted on community bulletin boards in the Glenwood area. About 65 eo le attended p P the September 16 meeting and many people provided oral or written comment at that meetin . g This Metro Plan amendment proposal is subject to the public notification and hearin g processes adopted by the City of Springfield in SDC 7,100, City of Eugene in EC 9.118 to 9.136 and Lane County in LC 12.240. The amendments were considered at a ' oint ublic hearin before ~ P g the Springfield, Eugene, and Lane County Planning Commissions on Gctober 13 199.8. Notice of s the Planning Commissions public hearing was published in the Register-Guard and the S rin field p g News. wrntten notice of the Jonnt Planning Commissions public hearin was mailed to residents and g property owners in Glenwood, those submitting comments at the September 16,1998 'oint elected . J official meeting, and persons who have requested notice. Minutes and ublic comments from the P September 16,1998 joint elected official meeting were included as part of the record of the nctober 13,199$ joint planning commission public hearing. Following the Gctober 13,1998 public hearing, the Spn~ngfneld and Eugene Plannin Commissions g voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Metro Plan amendments. The Lane Coun . tY Planrur~.g Comnission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the amendments at its Gctober 20,1995 meeting. Springfield and Eugene City Councils and Lane County Board of Commissioners held a dul ., Y notnced, on the record, point public hearing on November 16, 1998 to consider a royal pp modnficatxon, or denial of the amendments. Notice of the proposed amendments was sent to the Gregon Department of Land Conservation and Development ~DLCD} on Se tember 23 1995 at p a least 45 days prior to the November 16,199$ hearing on the amendments. These processes afford ample opportunity far citizen involvement consistent with Goal 1. Therefore the amendments are consistent with statewide planning Goal 1. Goal 2-Land Use Planning; To establish a land use planning process and olic amework p Y.~" as a basis for all decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure an ode uate actual base q f for such decisions and actions. This application to amend the Metro Plan text is consistent with Plan amendment rovisions found . p nn the Metro Plan, as codified nn the Eugene Code, Springfield Development Code and Lane Coun Code. The Metro Plan is an acknowledged comprehensive plan, pursuant to provisions s ecif ed b P y the Land Conservation and Development Commission. an September 16, 1998, the Springf eld City Council initiated this Type I Metro Plan text amendment. Provisions in the Springfield Development Code ~SDC 77.010 to 7.110}, Eu ene Code g SEC 9.11 S to 9.134}, and Lane Code PLC 12.240} specify the means by which the Metro Plan ma y be amended. Thns proposal, and the process for reviewing the requested amendments, follow the 2