Ordinance No. 20151 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

EXHIBIT A HEARINGS OFFICIAL MINUTES SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT FUR THE PAVING, CURBS, GUTTERS, STREET LIGHTS, PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, STREET TREES, FORCE MAIN, AND STURM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ON BARGER DRIVE FRUM TERRY STREET TO GREENHILL RUAD, AND THE PAVING, CURBS AND GUTTERS, STREET LIGHTS STREET TREES, WASTEWATER AND STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LEGACY STREET AND THE wASTEV~ATER SYSTEM ALUNG THE SOUTH, EAST, AND NURTH BOUNDARIES OF THE BETHEL #52 SCHggL DISTRICT PROPERTY -- TAX LOT #17-a4-2U-04-0140. ~JUB #35U3} ~CUNTRACT 98-42} A public hearing regarding this project was held on March 1,1999 at 6:00 p.m. in the First Floor Conference Room in the Eugene Hotel Building at Z44 E. Broadway, Eugene, Gregon. Hearings official Gary Darnielle presided. A staff presentation was made by Les Lyle, City Engineer. He was assisted by Michelle Cahill, Project Team Manager, and Bud DeSantis, Project Manager. Les Lyle explained that on April 6,1998, the City Council approved the formation of a local improvement district that identified the properties that would be in the final assessment. Mr. Lyle also noted that the City had received previous approval from Lane County to include properties outside of the City limits in the local improvement district. He stated that construction of the project has been completed and that all costs have been included in the calculation of the final assessment. The purpose of the hearing was to consider whether final assessments for project had been correctly calculated. Mr. Lyle explained that the Hearings Official had been provided with a staff memo and a copy of the cost distribution maps that show the project costs, the distribution of assessments to all of the properties as well as how the staff approached the stormwater and wastewater assessments. Mr. Lyle noted that actual final costs and actual engineering costs were used, which produced a net reduction to all properties. Based upon all of the final cost information, the 20 foot equivalent paving width was calculated to be $45.75 per front foot; the sanitary sewer was calculated at $0.1 S per square foot; the storm drainage improvements were calculated at $ 4.36 per square foot and the sidewalk and driveway improvements were calculated at $14.57 per front foot. Mr. Lyle also noted that the staff memo also identified the total assessable cost, the total cost to the city and the total project cost. Mr. Lyle noted that a wastewater force main was incorporated into the project but the pump station was a separate contract. This component extended from the pump station at the southwest corner of the school site up Legacy Street, down B arger Drive and then up Terry Street. Mr. Lyle explained that the same area approach, measuring 160 feet from the line that was constructed, was used in the distribution of costs for the stormwater and wastewater improvements. The shaded areas on the assessable area map represented the assessable area for stormwater improvements and the dotted line represented the assessable area for the wastewater improvements. Mr. Lyle explained that the lot line configuration of the properties at the time of the formation of the local improvement district was also considered. There had been some partitioning