Laserfiche WebLink
has development constraints such as slopes, floodplain, hydric soils and wetlands. <br />Development potential is reduced in Springfield on flood plain areas and in Eu ene on <br />.. g <br />remaining potential wetlands due to moderate constraints that can support a less intense <br />level of development. <br />6. Anticipated federal regulations affecting fish habitats in the Pacific Northwest and new <br />applications for regulating under-designated, saturated, hydric sails by fire on's Division <br />g <br />of State Lands, as well as other factors, make a definitive calculation of the buildable land <br />supply difficult. The adopted buildable land supply inventory represents the local <br />jurisdiction's best assessment of the amount of buildable land that will be available <br />within the urban growth boundary until the year 2015. <br />7. In 1995, approximately 28 percent of the buildable residential land su 1 did not have <br />pp Y <br />public services, primarily sewer. Of this total,1,136 acres or 12 percent will not be <br />served for ten or more years; 521 acres X5.5 percent} will be served in five to ten ears; <br />y <br />476 acres ~5 percent} m three to four years, and 520 acres X5.5 percent} in one to two <br />years. <br />8. In the aggregate, nonresidential land uses consume approximately 32 ercent of buildable <br />p <br />residential land. These nonresidential uses include churches, day care centers, arks, <br />p <br />streets, schools, neighborhood commercial, etc. <br />9. Some of the residential land demand will be meet through redevelopment and inf~11. <br />Residential infill is occurring primarily in areas with larger, single-family lots that have <br />surplus vacant land or passed over small vacant parcels. Redevelopment is occurrin <br />. g <br />primarily in the downtown Eugene and west University areas, where less intensive land <br />uses, such as parking lots and single-family dwellings are being replaced with higher <br />density, multi-family development. <br />10. Since the last Periodic Review of the .Metro Plan in 1987, there have been onl two <br />• .y <br />minor expansions of the UGB for res~dent~ally designated land. Each expansion was less <br />than one acre in size. <br />11. The UGB defines the extent of urban building and service expansion over the lannin <br />P g <br />period. There are geographic and resource constraints that will limit expansion of the <br />UGB in the future. At such time that expansion is warranted, it will be necessary to cross <br />a river, develop agricultural land, or cross over a ridge where the provision of public <br />services and facilities will be expensive. <br />12. Since adoption of the .Metro Plan, the supply of residential lands has been negatively <br />affected (diminished} due to federal, state, and local regulations to protect wetlands, <br />critical habitat of endangeredlthreatened species, and other similar natural resources, <br />This trend is likely to continue in order to meet future Statewide Planning Goal 5 and <br />stormwater quality protection requirements. <br />