Laserfiche WebLink
<br />R" <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />T <br /> <br />rtf <br /> <br />o t <br /> <br />he <br /> <br />Iver venue ranspo a Ion u reac omments <br /> BIKE lANES/PATHS <br /># Mtig Date I Group Comments <br /> 2005 <br />1 June 23 PO Bicyclists prefer off-street on hiah speed roads <br />2 June 23 PO Bike path prooosed on north side of street is excess <br />3 June 23 PO Bike paths on both sides is waste of money <br />4 June 23 PO Summary <br /> - Sidewalk on north side to post office <br /> - Combined path south side to existing path and then normal <br /> sidewalk on south side to east end. <br />5 June 23 PO Council heard no support going out to broaden scope e.g. bicyclists no truckers. <br /> Bikers don't pay gas taxes. Property owners foot the bill. <br />6 June 23 PO Crossing of River Ave on bikes at east end is a hazard due to speed of vehicles <br /> trying to get up to speed to enter Beltline <br />7 June 23 PO Heard from a couple bicyclists that it doesn't meet needs but they don't pay for <br /> improvements. <br />8 June 23 PO No bike lanes on north side, exception to McDonalds <br />9 June 23 PO Path stops at existing River oath bv Waste water treatment olant. <br />10 June 23 PO What do we have to provide for biCYClists? <br />11 June 23 PO Bicycle commuter, travels south on River Road, east on River Avenue, south on river <br /> bike paths to work. Prefers 2' to 5' bicycle lanes on street, minimum a bicycle <br /> shoulder <br />12 June 23 PO Should have bike path off of (south side) roadway. Raised pedestrian bike crossing <br /> to slow traffic (like what was done on Avres Road). <br />13 June 23 PO No bike lanes above sewage olant, connect to bike path available. <br />14 July 7 seeo Access to bicycle path is from River Ave. <br />15 July 7 seco Bike access at Owosso. <br />16 July 7 seeo Build combination bike/ped, surface water treatment, resurface don't do more until <br /> ODOT decision for studying Beltline. <br />17 July 7 sceo Could the improvement be extended under Beltline to Division? <br />18 July 7 seco Could there be a utilitarian path for bicyclists. <br />19 July 7 seeo Hardly ever see pedestrians, bicvclists onlv 00 to path at olant. <br />20 July 7 seco People that ride bikes to Dost office. Bike trail on one side. No need to duplicate. <br />21 July 7 seco Santa Clara oroanization would like connection north of BeltHne to existing path. <br />22 July 7 SCCO Sidewalk to Post Office sufficient. Don't need sidewalks beyond. Businesses east <br /> don't attract bikes/peds. <br />23 July 7 seeo What if there is only a bike path on one side, bioswale instead of piping, don't need <br /> curb, gutter, pipes. <br />24 July 7 seco i Why are there sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides, current shoulder wider than <br /> i city design. <br />25 July 7 seeo Bike lanes, if at all, only needed on south side of River Avenue; not enough traffic to <br /> justify pedestrian crossings or center turn lanes. <br />26 July 11 RRAR Bike lane from fiver path to Corliss Lane <br />27 July 11 RRAR Bike lanes from MWMC to the west <br />28 July 11 RRAR Bike lanes on road <br />29 July 11 RRAR Connect bike path under Beltline along River's edge <br />30 Julv 11 RRAR Direct route for bikes <br />31 July 11 RRAR Existing river bike path is sufficient <br />32 JulY 11 RRAR If connectivity under Beltline is made, fumish bike lanes entire lenClth of River Ave <br />33 July 11 RRAR If Corliss lane connection, need traffic control on River Ave for bicvcles <br />34 Julv 11 RRAR Joint oed/bike oath west of post office <br />35 July 11 RRAR One bike lane fulllenath of River Avenue <br /> PO = Property Owner River Avenue Transportation Improvements <br /> SCCO = Santa Clara Community Organization Summary of Outreach Comments <br /> RRAR = River Road Area Residents June/July 2005 p 10f9 <br /> ESC = Eugene Bicycle Coalition <br />