Laserfiche WebLink
<br />R" <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />T <br /> <br />rtaf <br /> <br />o t <br /> <br />he <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />Iver venue ranspo Ion u reac ommen s <br />194 July 7 SCCO Property owner didn't get credits for previous SOC payments. <br />195 July 7 SCCO Traveling road show be accompanied by elected officials. <br />196 July 7 SCCO Wait until OOOT does this study before doing this study. <br />197 July 7 SCCO What's the hurry? City staff trying to sell project and community doesn't want. <br /> Waste of monev. <br />198 July 7 SCCO Correct the roads and sewers but nothing else is needed! <br />199 July 7 SCCO Once again, City staff have spent their time and our money designing a project (1) <br /> without sufficient study of the need {2} without taking the pulse of public opinion <br /> and input (3) without a very clear sense of what OoOT plans to do that directly <br /> relates to this project, and (4) without leveling honestly with citizens and with city <br /> council. Please be sure city council and the mayor Qet copies of this. <br />200 July 11 RRAR Add siQn on Silver Ln before counts <br />201 July 11 RRAR Add third lane on Beltline instead. Wait for OoOT, <br />202 July 11 RRAR Bicyclists iust trvinQ to get taxpayers money <br />203 July 11 RRAR Bicyclists should pay licensing fees <br />204 July 11 RRAR Come back to neighborhood groups before council <br />205 July 11 RRAR Concern that a couple of property owner can adequately represent all <br />206 July 11 RRAR Consensus like Irving process can work, If common sense used, improvements <br /> could be made on one end and less improvements on other part of road <br />207 July 11 RRAR Design street to slow traffic <br /> "Unsafe for walkers because high speed cars <br />208 July 11 RRAR Do best to make improvements without depending on OOOT (22) <br />209 July 11 RRAR Don't want to wait for ODOT {4 more) <br />210 July 11 RRAR Encourage OOOT to improve River Rd-Beltline on-ramp <br />211 July 11 RRAR Fix holes to improve traffic safety <br />212 July 11 RRAR Fix potholes, shoulders, bike lanes <br />213 July 11 RRAR Growth occurrinQ, OOOT not doinQ anything <br />214 July 11 RRAR Has to be another answer for River Ave to BeltHne <br />215 Julv 11 RRAR If ramp is closed, trucks will gO to River Rd. Un~e OoOT not to close <br />216 July 11 RRAR Improvements to post office, not further <br />217 Julv 11 RRAR Keep staff costs down <br />218 July 11 RRAR MWl'V1C assessment <br />219 July 11 RRAR ODOT not providing fair share to Eugene area <br />220 July 11 RRAR Prioritize options to take to council <br />221 July 11 RRAR RRCO board hasn't has chance to review <br />222 July 11 RRAR See little bike-ped on east end <br />223 Julv 11 RRAR Was a pedestrian death a couple of years ago <br />224 July 11 RRAR Wasting money on DE <br />225 July 11 RRAR Will stakeholder comments be weiQhted equally <br />226 July 11 RRAR Without OOOT decision at River Ave-Beltline you may be wasting money <br />227 July 11 RRAR River Avenue should be improved UP to the post office. <br />228 July 11 RRAR Minimum travel lane width. <br />229 July 11 RRAR On street parking not necessary; businesses have their own lots. <br />230 July 11 RRAR It seems wisest to wait and see what ODOT's plans are for the area. The highest <br /> use is from RR to the PO -- improve that with ped/bike path, perhaps ped island. <br /> Very important to keep speed down; don't want to turn it into a freeway. <br />231 July 11 RRAR I receive no information until this meeting. I agree with improving River Avenue <br /> from River Road UP to the Post Office. <br />232 July 11 RRAR I haven't seen the desiqn vet. <br />233 July 11 RRAR Improve sighting westward from Post Office, so vehicles can tum both ways onto <br /> River Avenue. Removing the big shrub on the front of the house that was removed <br /> <br />PO = Property Owner <br />SCCO = Santa Clara Community Organization <br />RRAR = River Road Area Residents <br />ESC = Eugene Bicycle Coalition <br /> <br />River Avenue Transportation Improvements <br />Summary of Outreach Comments <br />June/July 2005 p 8 of 9 <br />