Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In addition, the proposed S-C development standards that are based in large part <br />on recommendations in the previous version of this report provide specific design <br />and siting standards to prevent or mitigate the negative impact of infil1 and <br />redevelopment. Although this report and the S-C development standards focus on <br />the CR project area, many of the concerns and solutions will apply to other <br />established Eugene neighborhoods, as welt. <br /> <br />Wherever your interests lie, we also recommend your read the Guest Viewpoint, <br />"Eugene zoning laws sacrifice livability:' published in the July 10, 2005 edition <br />of The Register-Guard and available at www.cnrNeighbors.org.This essay <br />presents the fundamental rationale that underlies much of this repores <br />recommendations: protecting established neighborhoods is essential to compact <br />growth and a healthy urban core. <br /> <br />The people who wrote this report <br /> <br />This report is a collaborative product of over thirty households in the CR project <br />area who have contributed hundreds of hours toward the project. Most of the <br />participants live east of Chambers Street in the larger Wests ide neighborhood. <br /> <br />Many of the neighbors who helped create this report participated in one or more <br />of the three "Neighborhood Meetings" that were conducted by City staff and <br />consultants, including the Visual Preference Survey (VPS) and the discussion of <br />the VPS results at the third meeting.7 Neighbors also actively participated in the <br />City-led "Residential Focus Group" in March 2005 and the "Public Design <br />Review" meeting in April 2005. <br /> <br />Since the CR project "kickoff" meeting in September 2004, neighbors have had <br />many discussions among themselves, including via an ongoing Yahoo! e-mail <br />discussion group, numerous group meetings in residents' living rooms, a group <br />walking tour of the project area, a design standards educational "boot camp," and <br />numerous sidewalk and telephone conversations. <br /> <br />In early 2005, we formed an organization known as Chambers Area Families <br />for Healthy Neighborhoods (CAFHN, pronounced "caffeine"). CAFlIN <br />maintains an independent Web site (www.cnrNeighbors.org) with information on <br />the CR project and our organization's work. We encourage you to visit this site <br />and especially take the visual tour of , 'Good, Bad, and Ugly InfiIl in Eugene" to <br />see local examples of what this report describes. <br /> <br />Neighbors who belong to CAFHN represent diverse interests, backgrounds, and <br />areas of expertise. Among our group are many families who own and live in their <br />houses. We also have several long-term and newer neighbors who rent houses and <br />apartments in the neighborhood. Our group includes people who have a secondary <br />rental unit on the same property where they live, as wen as people who own <br />separate rental properties. We also have several families that are local real estate <br /> <br />7 Results of the VPS are available on the City's Mixed-Use Development Web site. See "Resources" in <br />Section IX of this report. <br /> <br />November I, 2005 <br /> <br />Chambers Revisited - NeighborsJ Report <br /> <br />3 <br />