Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LOWE Allen 0 <br /> <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Cc: <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Becky Riley [briley@efn.org] <br />Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:20 AM <br />"Eugene Mayor and City Council <br />LOWE Allen D <br />Please support Chambers Special Area Zone <br /> <br />November 8, 2005 <br /> <br />City Councilors <br />Mayor Kitty Piercy <br />City of Eugene <br />777 Pearl Street <br />Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br /> <br />To Mayor piercy and Councilors: <br /> <br />Next Monday, November 14th, you will be considering Land Use Code <br />Amendments to implement the Chambers Special Area Zone. As a <br />resident of the River Road neighborhood, I urge you to adopt those <br />code amendments. <br /> <br />Residents of our neighborhood, like those in the Chambers area, <br />appreciate the existing character and ambience of our <br />neighborhood--in our case, the larger lots, older homes, lovely old <br />street trees, rural feel of the roads sans sidewalks, curb and <br />gutter, etc. <br /> <br />Some of us on the neighborhood association board have been supportive <br />of the City's efforts to establish higher density mixed use centers <br />in specific zones of our neighborhood. We understand the importance <br />of accommodating higher density housing in our area, and other <br />neighborhoods of the city, to prevent sprawl. And we understand the <br />benefit of commercial centers in our neighborhood to reduce the need <br />for residents to travel across tOWIl, thus reducing traffic problems. <br />Finally, we welcome the idea of reviving a vibrant, attractive/ <br />walkable "downtown" for our neighborhood--recognizing that this can <br />form the very fabric of a livable neighborhood. We have worked to <br />encourage neighborhood residents to see the benefits and to embrace <br />the concept of mixed use centers/ too. <br /> <br />Meantime, though, there is also increasing opposition to the new and <br />infill development underway in many parts of our neighborhood. <br />People resent the gobbling up of open space, and feel that the new <br />streets and housing developments are clashing with the character of <br />existing streets and homes. They say they want to move/ and/or put <br />up "anti-annexation" signs in their yards in response. <br /> <br />When our board first discussed and voted to support mixed use centers <br />for our neighborhood, we had a frank discussion about people's fears <br />about increasing density. There was unanimous agreement that density <br />could be accommodated, but design standards and design review were <br />essential. But there was also significant concern that current "one <br />size fits all" City standards, as we are seeing them being <br />implemented, are not sufficient to ensure development that is <br />attractive and compatible with our neighborhood. <br /> <br />The work the City has done with the residents of the Chambers <br />area--to develop standards for accommodating density that IS <br />compatible with THEIR neighborhood--has given me great hope. As our <br />neighborhood moves into the first phase of working with City planners <br />on a mixed use center for the south end of River Road, this is <br />something I can point to and say "see, the City WILL work closely <br /> <br />1 <br />