Laserfiche WebLink
a committee composed of planning commission members from <br />the three jurisdictions, called the Joint Planning <br />Commission Committee ~JPCC}, and eliminating the <br />mandatory review of substantive Plan amendments by a <br />citizen involvement advisory committee. <br />5. Proposed revisions to the plan amendment process were <br />developed by staff and reviewed by MAPAC and the three <br />metropolitan planning commissions during the spring and <br />summer of 1989. These meetings were noticed through <br />mailouts to interested parties and by news releases to <br />local newspapers. <br />6. Dn October 11, 1989, the Eugene City Council the <br />Springfield City Council and the Lane County Board of <br />County Commissioners reviewed proposed revisions to the <br />Metropolitan Plan amendment process at a joint public <br />hearing. The elected officials reached consensus on <br />guidelines for the preparation of revisions to Chapter <br />IV of the Metropolitan Plan and implementing code <br />language at this public hearing. The proposed revisions <br />tv Chapter IV implicitly acknowledged the elimination of <br />MAPAC and the removal of mandatory substantive review of <br />Plan amendments by a citizen advisory committee. This <br />public hearing was noticed through mailings to interested <br />parties and through news releases to local newspapers. <br />7. on April lb, 1990, the Joint Planning Commission <br />Committee ~JPCC~ reviewed and approved revisions to <br />Chapter Iv of the Metropolitan Plan and implementing code <br />language based upon the Dctober 11, 1989 consensus <br />guidelines. This meeting was noticed through mailings <br />to interested parties and by news releases through local <br />newspapers. <br />S . Dn May 2 4 , 19 9 0 , the Eugene, Springfield and Lane County <br />planning commissions, at a joint public hearing, <br />considered and recommended approval of the proposed <br />revisions to Chapter IV of the Metropolitan Plan. The <br />three planning commissions considered and recommended <br />approval, with slight modifications, of the implementing <br />code language. Interested parties were notified of this <br />meeting, a display ad was placed in the Register Guard <br />newspaper 30 days prior to the public hearing, and a <br />legal advertisement of the public hearing was placed in <br />the Register Guard newspaper ten days prior to the public <br />hearing. <br />9. On September 5, 1990, the Springfield Planning <br />Commission, at a public hearing, considered and approved <br />a proposed amendment to Section K of Chapter III of the <br />Metropolitan Plan. This amendment dissolved MAPAC and <br />Exhibit A - 2 <br />