Laserfiche WebLink
4. One other item considered in the calculation of assessments was the <br />proportion of the total lot to the levy area. In a few instances the <br />lateral area and the levy area are the same because the size of the whole <br />lot indicates it could be further developed and the remainder of the levy <br />due charged at that time, Carol Zorn awns a panhandle lot on North Park <br />X17-04-23-23-4101 which fits this criteria. Tom zorn has indicated that <br />lot 4101 would be joined with others for further development in the <br />future. Even if this was not the case the 72,191 square foot lot could <br />be developed beyond the current use of a single family dwelling and horse <br />pasture. Staff did not include lot 4101 in the group where levy and <br />lateral area were the same. After additional review Staff recommends the <br />levy area be lowered to match the lateral area and the assessment be <br />lowered accordingly. <br />5. Some people have misunderstood the Staff explanation that sharing a <br />public service line ~i.e. a "wye" placed at a property line so that two <br />properties share the public service lined "will reduce your costs <br />somewhat" . Service line costs are reduced project wide since fewer <br />service lines are required overall but there is not a direct benefit to <br />properties which share the "wye". Cost distribution is based on EC 7.175 <br />whereby we sum all the costs associated with constructing the services <br />and divide by the number of connection points to compute a cost per <br />connection point, commonly called the service. Mr. Jack Stutz has <br />submitted a 1 etter which i s attached . <br />BASINS A, B, AND C SANITARY SEWERS <br />RIVER ROAD AREA LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PAGE 10 <br />