Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />February ~7, 1991 <br />T0: Jack Billings, Hearing Official <br />FROM: Michelle Cahill, Project Engineer <br />SUBJECT: Response to hearing testimony - River Road Sanitary Sewer Assess- <br />ment Basins A, B and C <br />Attached are three letters received by February 26 at 5 p.m. concerning the <br />proposed assessments far Sanitary Sewers in River Road Basins A, B, and C. <br />We did not receive a letter from vora Heintz who indicated at the hearing <br />that she would submit additional testimony. I have checked with the City <br />Manager's office as well as the main Public Works office and no other letters <br />were received there. <br />This memo includes some additional information about lots developed as park- <br />ing lots; a revised recommendation for the proposed assessment where a "wye" <br />was provided to a lot on Elkay Drive with two houses; and estimated develop- <br />ment costs and assessment of a twenty acre lot compared to a similar size <br />parcel of developed properties. <br />PARKING LOTS <br />In the summer of 1990, River Road widening project was under construction. <br />As part of the widening project right-of -way was acquired from tax 1 of <br />17-04-24-24-6900 owned by Roberta Konnie. The acquisition included area that <br />was used for parking for the shopping center located on the tax lot. Damages <br />were paid to Ms. Konnie for the diminished earning capacity of the shopping <br />center due to the lass of parking. Ms. Konnie then purchased the adjoining <br />tax lots X6600 and 6700} and improved them with additional asphalt paving to <br />provide parking for the shopping center. Lots 6600 and 6700 had been uti- <br />lized by Gull Industries and apparently were partially paved.} <br />If there is a change of use for the shopping center the parking requirements <br />would be reviewed and either the adjoining lots would be required as parking <br />or the existing shopping center would have a reduction in current use. If <br />there is nOt a change in use for lot 6900 then there is no process for review <br />of the parking and ensuring code requirements are met. The use of the ad- <br />joining tax lots for parking is voluntary on the part of Konnies' at the <br />current time. <br />Staff has reviewed with Mr. Konnie an option of signing a statement acknowlW <br />edging further assessment for lots 6604 and 6700 where the parking lots are <br />currently located} based on the 8" equivalent if the shopping center use is <br />changed or the parking lots are further developed. Mr. Konnie is agreeable <br />to this approach. <br />