Laserfiche WebLink
If the assessment i s not 1 evi ed at this time on tax 1 ots 6600 and 6100 staff <br />recommends that the assessment for tax lot 11-04-24-21-7300 also not be lev- <br />ied at this time as this is a similar situatian of only a parking lot on this <br />lot. <br />"WYE FOR TWO SERVICES" <br />Roberta and Steve Thompson expressed concern at the hearing about being <br />treated the same as other property owners on their street. The Thompsons' <br />pointed out that they had two houses on their lot and would run separate <br />services to each 1 of ~conformi ng to current code} during the construction of <br />the sewer in front of their house last summer. Staff required a "wye" be <br />provided far two connection points and proposed to assess them for two con- <br />nection points. <br />Upon further review staff agrees that there are lots on Elkay that have two <br />separate houses and were not provided a "wye" and were assessed for one ser- <br />vice. The second house in these cases was not obvious and was not brought to <br />the attention of the staff determining service locations and numbers. Be- <br />cause providing a "wye" for lots needing separate service lines was not done <br />in a consistent manner staff recommends that the Thompsons be assessed for <br />one service. <br />LARGE DEVELOPABLE LOTS <br />John Harrison is concerned that several developed lots pay more for the sewer <br />than a vacant undivided large lot of similar size. He feels that the large <br />lot gains much more benefit from the sewer because it can divide into smaller <br />lots and the fats then have a higher value. <br />Depending on the configuration, the assessment for a twenty acre undivided <br />property, call it parcel "A", could be less or more than a twenty acre devel- <br />oped1~~ property, parcel "B" . However, i f the assessment i s 1 ess today parcel <br />"A" : ~wi 11 need addi ti anal sewers bui 1 t at additional cast i n order to subdi - <br />v~de. <br />Different configurations and related costs are described in the following <br />p ragraphs. These examples use the $0.30 per square foot of area within 160' <br />1.teral cast only for the 199o assessment comparison. Only the lateral <br />costs are used since 100 lots would require 100 connection points and each <br />connection point will cost approximately the same. All property is assessed <br />the $0.025 per total lot square foot levy regardless of configuration.} <br />These examples also use the cost of $65 per lineal foot of sewer pipe far <br />additional sewer lines needed for further development. This price includes <br />construction, engineering, and administration and is approximately equal to <br />the lineal foot cost of the lateral sewers built in 1990 in River Road. <br />If parcel "A" ran the length of the new sewer and was 160' deep or less the <br />parcel would be fully assessed over all the property including potential <br />future right-af-way. The developed parcel "B" has the right-of-way deducted <br />from the assessable area prior to the assessment calculation. In this situa- <br />