Laserfiche WebLink
Section 9.~45~2}~c~: The plan amendment is found to address one or more <br />of the fo.l 1 owl ng: <br />~. An error in the publication of the plan; <br />2. A change in circumstances in a substantial manner not anticipated in <br />the plan; <br />3. Incorporation in the plan of new inventory material which relates to <br />a statewide goal; and <br />4. A change in public policy. <br />The request appears to address #2, a change in circumstance, and #4, a change <br />in public policy. There has been no showing that there has been any new <br />inventory material that relates to a statewide goal ~#3}. The applicant <br />indicates that there may be a showing of error since there was a written <br />agreement between the City and the owner in 1968 that allowed for continued <br />use of the property by Goodwill Industries. When the plan was adopted in <br />1915 and updated in 1982, Goodwill Industries occupied the site and were an <br />established nonconforming use. While this situation was not specifically <br />addressed in the plan, the absence of specific mention of this site or the <br />nonconforming use does not indicate and error in the publication of the plan, <br />It is the staff opinion that there has been a change in circumstance that was <br />not anticipated in the refinement plan. As indicated in the background sec- <br />tion of these notes, the site was occupied by Goodwill Industries in 1915 and <br />1982, when the Bethel-Danebo Refinement Plan was originally adopted and later <br />when it was revised.. The staff has researched discussion and recollections <br />of these refinement plan processes and finds no specific discussion occurred <br />relating to this property. It was used at that time as a nonconforming in- <br />dustrial use and the assumption was that it would continue to operate. There <br />was no reason to include specific refinement plan treatment of this site. <br />Goodwill has discontinued use of the site and ownership has changed. While a <br />change in ownership in itself is not basis for considering special land use <br />relief, in this case the only viable use of the existing property and build- <br />ing was with the previous Goodwill Industries development. Based on these <br />facts, there appears to be reason to address the specific history and exist- <br />ing development on this property. The proposed mixed-use designation and <br />refinement plan language will provide specific direction far continued use of <br />.this site in a manner that addresses this unique situation. <br />Another basis for addressing the standards in this criteria are a change in <br />public policy. The provisions allowing the creation of a mixed use zoning <br />district were adopted in the Eugene Zoning Code in 1977, two years after <br />adoption of the original Bethel-Danebo Refinement Plan. When the Plan was <br />updated in 1982, the emphasis of study was an the delineation of the three <br />development nodes. The concept of mixed use has been implemented in other <br />areas of the city, including portions of the Whiteaker area, since adoption <br />of these provisions. <br />In 1984, the City Council updated the Eugene Community Goals and .Policies. <br />The 1954 document included anew policy as follows: <br />STAFF NQTES--Eugene Planning Commission January 22, 1991 Page 5 <br />