Laserfiche WebLink
announcement of the hearing and nature of the application <br />shall be published at least once i n the Re~i stet Guard news- <br />paper. "~~" ` <br />2. Within 15 days of the c1 ose of the hearing and the <br />record, the board shall decide whether to designate the prop- <br />erty, structure, landscape feature, object or site as an his- <br />tori c 1 andmark. The board shal 1 not des i gnate a di stri ct, <br />ensemble or thematic group if mare than half of the owners of <br />privately-owned property i n the area sought to be designated <br />file written objections to the proposed designation. The de- <br />ci s i vn of the board shall be i n writing and contain findings <br />and conclusions on the integrity, historic significance, and <br />the conflicting use determinations set out bet ow. Any deci - <br />sion to designate shall include development standards as pro- <br />v~ ded ~ n .section 2.408 of this code. The board shall desi g- <br />nate the property, structure, 1 andscape feature, abject or <br />s~ to as an h~ story c 1 andmark i f i t finds that: <br />a. Des i gnat i an i s cans i stent with applicable his - <br />tori c preservation policies contained i n the Metropolitan <br />Area General P1 an and applicable adopted neighborhood <br />refinement plans, special area studies, and functional <br />plans. In the event of inconsistencies between these <br />plans or studies and the Metropo1 i tan Area General P1 an, <br />the 1 otter i s the prevai 1 i ng document; <br />b. The proposed historic 1 andmark has integrity of <br />location, design, setting, materials or workmanship; <br />c. The proposed historic landmark has historic <br />significance; and, <br />d. The value of preserving the property, structure, <br />.object or site as an historic 1 andmark outweighs the <br />value of using the property, structure, landscape feature, <br />object or site for the identified conflicting use, taking <br />into consideration the economic, social , environmental <br />and energy consequences of each alternative. If the <br />owner of,the proposed historic landmark supports the <br />designation there is a rebuttable presumption that the <br />value of preservation outweighs the value of using the <br />proposed historic 1 andmark far the identified conf 1 i ct i ng <br />use. <br />1. A not i ce of the board's decision shall be ma i 1 ed <br />within five days of the decision to the owner and occupants <br />of the proposed historic 1 andmark, the applicant, and persons <br />who ,have requested notification. Unless appealed, the board's <br />deco soon ~ s effective on the eleventh day after notice of the <br />decision is mailed. <br />~c} A eats. Within ten days of the date that notice of the <br />board's decision i s ma i 1 ed, the decision may be appealed to the <br />council by the owner, appl icant, a party, an adversely affected <br />person, or a person enti t1 ed to notice under subsection fib} I , of <br />this section. The appeal shat 1 be made by f i ] i ng a statement of <br />issues on appeal and other information on a form prescribed by the <br />city. The appeal shall be based on the record, shall state s eci - <br />P <br />ordinance - 10 <br />