Ordinance No. 19348 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

D, Partially in response tv Goal 11, Objective S, page II-B-3 of the Metropolitan Plan identifies the desirability of encouraging the use of underdeveloped and vacant 1 and where services are avai 1 abl e. E, Table 1 of the draft Riverfront Study shows that the entire study area encompasses about 148 acres. F. The draft Study concludes that the western portion of the study area has been part of the Gi ty of Eugene since the 1870' s and a f ul 1 range of urban services i s avai 1 abl a to the entire study area. G. The draft Riverfront Study, and the proposed amendment to the Metropolitan Plan are consistent with the direction established in the Eugene- Spri ngf i e1 d Metropvl i tan Area General P1 an, and complies with Goal 11. Goal 1Z. Transportation A, Goal 12, Transportation is intended to "encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system." B. The Eugene~Springfield Area 2000 Transportation Plan, the Metropolitan Bikeway Plan and the Transportation Chapter of the Metropolitan Plan address area-wide transportation issues and were considered in the LCDC's decision to acknowledge planning in the metropolitan area as being in compliance with Statewide Goals i n 1982 . C. T-2004 directs that development and transportation improvements be aimed at avoiding Level of Service "E" . D. T-2000 identifies Franklin Boulevard, which provides access to the Riverfront area, as a ma j or metropolitan-area arteri a 1. E. Franklin Boulevard i s under the jurisdictional responsi bi 1 i ty of the Oregon Department of Transportation ~ODOT} and transportation improvements affecting the street are controlled by that agency. F. Objective 8, page III-F-4 of the Metropolitan P1 an identifies the need to promote 1 and use arrangements which wi 11 opti mi ~e use of existing and planned transportation faci 1 i ti es. . G. Policies 1~f} and 6, page III-F-5 of the Metropolitan Plan direct that development and redevelopment which is served by the existing or planned transit system be encouraged and that new development include facilities which wi 11 accommodate urban public transit as wel 1 as other al ternati ave transportation modes, e.g., bicycles. H. The South Bank Bike Path described on page 56 i n the Metropolitan Bikeway Master Plan calls for development of an independent bike path to parallel the river bank between Ferry Street Bridge and I-5, I . Policy 1~ g} , page III-F-5 of the Metropvl i tan Plan directs that pedestrian facilities be developed in conjunction with major activity centers or in conjunction with other modes of travel . J. Appendix C of the draft Riverfront Study cantalns detailed analysis of the level of development which could be accommodated abased on a theoretical ~XH~B~T PaG~ ~ OF