Laserfiche WebLink
C. Goal 1, page II-B-2 of the Metropolitan Plan addresses growth mana ement <br />g <br />and the urban service area, cal 1 i ng for the efficient use of urban 1 ands . <br />D. Objective 8, page II-B-3 of the Metropolitan Plan encoura es develo ment <br />9 p <br />of vacant, uderdeveloped and redeve]opable land where services are <br />avai 1 abl a and some publ ~ c expenditures have already been made . <br />E. Objective H, page III-F-4 of the Metropolitan P1 an directs the ci t to <br />Y <br />promote land use arrangements which will optimize use of existing and <br />planned transportation facilities and services and which will rovide <br />choices i n usi n alternative trans p <br />g portation modes. <br />F. Policy #~, Page III-F-5 of the Metropolitan Plan contains recommendations <br />aimed at reducing transportation energy demand and increasin <br />opportunities for use of alternative modes i g <br />nclud~ng: <br />a~ medium and high density residential development wi thi n a mi 1 e of <br />downtown Eugene; <br />b} encouraging existing employment centers to grow and diversify b <br />Y <br />concentrating new commercial, governmental and light industrial uses <br />~in them; <br />c~ encouraging medium and high density residential development <br />within one-hal f mi 1 e of existing and future employment centers; <br />d encouraging,deve1opment and redevelopment in designated areas <br />which are relatively well seved by the existing or planned urban <br />public transit system. <br />G. Policy #13, page III-J -6 of the Metropolitan Plan encourages cooperation <br />and communication between citizens, utilities, and local governments, <br />concerning energy-related issues. <br />H. Policies B6 and B7 page 8 of the draft Ri verf rout Park Special Area Stud <br />y <br />recognize th.e area's pr~oxi mi ty to existing alternative transportation <br />faci 1 i ti es, particularly the ri verfront bike path system, exi sti n <br />b~ cycl e- edestr~ an bri d e and rai g <br />P g 1 road underpass. <br />I. Policy B2 of the draft Study calls far a significant effort to incor orate <br />transit facilities and i m r P <br />p ovements into future development plans for the <br />area. <br />J. Cost estimates far planned public improvements to meet transit needs in <br />the study area are included in Appendix C of the draft Study and <br />identified as a component i n financial planning for the area. <br />K. The Special Development District, which is part of the draft Stud <br />requires that anal sis be conducted y' <br />y to determine 7f planned public <br />faci 1 i ti es can accommodate the requirements of the proposed develo ement. <br />p <br />L. Policies contained i n the draft Ri verfront Spei cal Area Stud cal 1 for an <br />Y <br />intensity of development that will make the most efficient use of the <br />site, whi 1 e recagni zi ng environmental and open space needs of the area. <br />h'1. Policy A4 and development standards contained in the Plannin <br />Commission's ro osed SD S ecial Develo g <br />P p ~ P pment District, provide for a <br />EXHIDIT <br />PAGE ~ ~ OF. 1 ~-~' <br />