Laserfiche WebLink
<br />documents and information related to the vacation request, such as consent forms, are contained in a <br />binder that has been placed in the Council Office. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Notice <br />In accordance with EC 9.7440 and ORS 271.110, notice of public hearing for the requested alley <br />vacation has been provided in the following manner: On February 3, 2009, notice was mailed to <br />property owners, interested parties and the Downtown Neighborhood Association, the officially <br />recognized neighborhood group; on February 6, 2009, the property was posted in the immediate <br />vicinity of the requested alley vacation; and on February 3, 2009, and February 10, 2009, legal <br />notice was published in The Register-Guard newspaper. As of the date of this report, no responses <br />to the public notice have been received by the Planning Division. <br /> <br />Consent of Abutting and Affected Property Owners <br />In accordance with ORS 271.080, the URA has provided evidence of consent to the alley vacation <br />from all abutting property owners and from property owners of at least two-thirds of the property <br />within the affected area. The affected area is defined by ORS as an area that is 200 feet on either <br />side of the alley and 400 feet at each end of the alley. The URA owns all of the properties abutting <br />the alley right-of-way proposed for vacation. The materials submitted with the alley vacation <br />application include consent forms signed by a representative from the City of Eugene on behalf of <br />the URA. The application materials also include consent forms signed by property owners of more <br />than two-thirds of the affected (required consent) area. Copies of the signed consent forms, along <br />with maps showing the affected areas and those properties with signed consent forms are included <br />in the binder that has been placed in the Council Office. <br /> <br />Applicable Criteria <br />The Eugene City Council will address the relevant approval criteria from EC 9.8725 in making a <br />decision on the proposed alley vacation, as listed below: <br /> <br />The City Council shall approve, or approve with conditions and reservations of <br />easements, the vacation of improved public right-of-way, public ways acquired with <br />public funds, or undeveloped subdivision and partition plats, or portions thereof, <br />including public right-of-way and improved public easements located therein, only if the <br />council finds that approval of the vacation is in the public interest. <br /> <br />Additionally ORS 271.120 is relevant as listed below: <br /> <br />271.120 Hearing; determination. <br /> At the time fixed by the governing body for hearing the <br />petition and any objections filed thereto or at any postponement or continuance of such matter, <br />the governing body shall hear the petition and objections and shall determine whether the <br />consent of the owners of the requisite area has been obtained, whether notice has been duly <br />given and whether the public interest will be prejudiced by the vacation of such plat or street or <br />parts thereof. If such matters are determined in favor of the petition the governing body shall by <br />ordinance make such determination a matter of record and vacate such plat or street; otherwise <br />it shall deny the petition. The governing body may, upon hearing, grant the petition in part and <br />deny it in part, and make such reservations, or either, as appear to be for the public interest. <br /> <br />As noted above, consent of the required area has been obtained and public notice has been given in <br />accordance with statutory and local code requirements. Staff analysis further indicates that basic <br /> Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M090217\S0902173.doc <br /> <br />