Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />provision of necessary public services and facilities such as transportation and utilities in the area <br />can be maintained upon approval of the vacation requests. <br /> <br />The alley vacation request was referred to affected City departments and public utility service <br />providers. City of Eugene Public Works Transportation and Engineering staff and the Fire <br />Marshal’s Office have indicated the alley vacation would not compromise transportation, <br />emergency access, or stormwater and wastewater systems. Referral comments from Public Works <br />staff note that adequate public rights-of-way exist to satisfy all access and traffic circulation in this <br />vicinity. Adjacent uses will continue to have access from the northern portion of the alley, as well as <br />the east-west alley between Olive and Charnelton Streets and the surrounding public street system. <br />Referral comments and letters of concurrence from utility providers have confirmed that there are <br />no stormwater, wastewater, water, electric, or natural gas lines located in the alley and that Qwest <br />utilities can either be relocated or addressed through a private utility easement. <br /> <br />While staff findings indicate that the vacation requests can be accommodated at this fundamental <br />level, it remains within the council’s purview to identify what additional requirements, if any, must <br />be made to find that the requests support the public interest in order for the City to release <br />ownership of the right-of-way. Draft findings in support of the alley vacation request are included <br />as Exhibit B to the draft ordinance (Attachment C). These draft findings provide a more <br /> <br />comprehensive evaluation than the comments listed above. <br /> <br />Determination of Assessment <br />Pursuant to EC 9.8710(4), the applicant is required to pay a deposit equal to the assessment of <br />special benefit resulting from the vacation and the disposition of the property to the benefited <br />property owners. The assessed value of special benefit is to be determined by the City Manager. In <br />this instance, the value of the real property for the alley was determined to be $20,966, according to <br />a Basis of Value report prepared by the City. The URA has deposited $20,966 with the City in <br />advance of the public hearing, as required. If the application is approved, the deposit shall be <br />retained by the City, or if the application is denied the money shall be returned. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Approval criteria for vacation requests (the full text is included above) located at EC 9.8725, <br />and corresponding statutory provisions at ORS 271.120, which require the council to find <br />that approval of the vacation requests is in the public interest. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />The City Council may consider the following options: <br />1. Approve the vacation request by ordinance; <br />2. Approve the vacation request by ordinance with specific modifications as determined by the <br />City Council; <br />3. Deny the vacation request by ordinance. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M090217\S0902173.doc <br /> <br />