My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: River Road/Santa Clara Transition Project
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 01/11/06 WS
>
Item A: River Road/Santa Clara Transition Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:04:52 PM
Creation date
1/6/2006 2:37:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Advantages: Already a City program; may help mitigate impacts of decisions to upgrade <br />and/or connect streets; avoids to a great extent any policy and uniformity issues <br />associated with varying standards for individual neighborhoods; traffic calming <br />improvements - besides the safety benefits – can be used to help connect <br />neighborhoods across busy streets <br />Challenges: Such improvements can be relatively expensive; some view such improvements <br />as annoying to dangerous to simply too costly relative to the benefit <br /> <br />? <br />Option No. 6: Arterial and Collector Upgrades - <br /> In addition to applying some or all of the ideas <br />above, the City might consider deferring complete urban street upgrades to higher traffic volume <br />thresholds than presently applied. (Note: the term “threshold” is used generically. The City does <br />not have a street upgrade policy triggered by measured levels of service) <br /> <br />Advantages: Preserves existing streetscapes; defers high costs associated with arterial or <br />collector upgrades <br />Challenges: Safety, maintenance and traffic volume issues for street functioning as arterials <br />or collectors without the physical capacity to do so properly; higher volume <br />thresholds may be reached at a juncture where financing or priorities for such <br />improvements are low; as arterials and collectors serve larger “constituencies” <br />than just the neighborhoods they pass through, not all users may be sympathetic <br /> <br />to “heritage” considerations <br /> <br />What Another Community Has Done <br /> <br /> <br />The City of Eugene is its own best example for some of options outlined above. The City already has a <br />traffic calming program underway. The City has also been examining “Context Sensitive Design” <br />Standards for at least one Eugene neighborhood (Crest Drive). The ideas presented above are simply <br />some potential elements of a “context sensitive” reconsideration of the street standards applied to Santa <br />Clara and River Road. <br /> <br />The City of Wilsonville, Oregon has a longstanding street tree preservation policy that has been applied to <br />all levels of street classifications. Connectivity can be deferred, sidewalks eliminated, building-to-curb <br />setbacks reduced, street sections shifted within the right-of-way, and even rights-of-way reduced or re- <br />routed. The threshold in the decline in level of service that warrants street upgrades are also set higher in <br />Wilsonville than in some other communities. This policy is also applied to preserve wetlands and other <br />sensitive lands in Wilsonville that are impacted by street extensions or upgrades. The City of Wilsonville <br />also waives selected street standards in older neighborhoods in favor of preservation of the historic <br />character of such areas. These policies have been applied to all street classifications – arterials, <br />collectors and local streets <br />38 <br />River Road/Santa Clara Transition/Heritage White Paper <br />DRAFT <br />11-24-05 <br /> <br />Service provider Review <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.