My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: River Road/Santa Clara Transition Project
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 01/11/06 WS
>
Item A: River Road/Santa Clara Transition Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:04:52 PM
Creation date
1/6/2006 2:37:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Surface Water Management <br /> <br /> <br />Current Situation <br /> <br />The City of Eugene and Lane County share surface water management responsibilities in the River Road <br />and Santa Clara neighborhoods. The City and County are jointly undertaking a joint surface water master <br />plan for the two neighborhoods. Reviewed materials (such as the 2002 Urban Services Report) don’t <br />perceived <br />identify any major surface water issues in the neighborhoods, although this could change as <br />additional subdivision and infill occurs and older properties redevelop with more impermeable surfaces (or <br />when a major storm event or particularly wet winter season causes significant flooding and drainage <br />problems). Those concerns that are expressed in the 2002 Committee report primarily speak to storm <br />water quantity and localized flooding issues such as: <br /> <br />? <br /> Yard debris removal and illegal dumping (presumably with respect to the impact on localized <br />flooding from clogged catch basins) <br />? <br /> Destruction and alteration of natural drainage channels and streams. <br />? <br /> Need for better planning and regulation of building and development practices that impact <br />drainage. <br /> <br />Water quality issues are simply not mentioned in the 2002 Urban Services Report. Further examination or <br />events could reveal more universal concerns, as surface water management has become a major driver <br />of community planning in other Oregon communities (as well as other parts of Eugene). <br /> <br />City of Eugene officials have identified a range of issues that past and present circumstances may not as <br />yet been “brought to the fore” in the minds of neighborhood residents. These include: <br /> <br />? <br /> The number of drywells in the two neighborhoods that may not comply with current environmental <br />regulations <br />? <br /> Lack of an approved basin and surface water master plan(s) and regulations for the <br />neighborhoods (the City and County have such plans and regulations in development) <br />? <br /> Lack of water quality protections and TMDL standards for local waterways (these efforts are also <br />underway by the City and County) <br /> <br />Concerns over the ability of rural surface water systems to handle urban flows are many and legitimate, <br />although public agencies and private engineers have over the last 15 years been developing many <br />“greenfrastructure” solutions to both surface water quality and quantity concerns. Clean Water Services <br />(formerly the Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County) and its partner cities, and Portland’s <br />Bureau of Environmental Services, have pioneered many innovative and effective techniques, some of <br />which have the side “benefit” of preserving more “rural type” landscapes and streetscapes. Although <br />these solutions work best when undertaken in a comprehensive manner (e.g.: “ridgetop to streambed” <br />solutions that include site design, vegetative cover, “green streets”, sensitive lands preservation, surface <br />permeability limitations, and more), individual surface water system components (for instance, bio-swales) <br />do have individual utility when applied in situations that best support their effectiveness. <br /> <br />Transition and Heritage Options <br /> <br />Surface water management appears to have few distinct transition or heritage impacts for River Road and <br />except <br />Santa Clara, for the impacts of various road drainage options on existing streetscapes and/or the <br />benefits of preserving natural, drainage and stream corridors for both open space and surface water <br />management benefits. These benefits, especially when combined with other potential community <br />strategies, such a context sensitive street design and open space preservation, can be significant. These <br />are discussed briefly below and reiterated in specific options discussed under the “Planning”, Streets and <br />Transportation”, and “Parks and Open Space” sections of this White Paper <br />39 <br />River Road/Santa Clara Transition/Heritage White Paper <br />DRAFT <br />11-24-05 <br /> <br />Service provider Review <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.