My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A-MWMC Facilities Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-05/19/04WS
>
Item A-MWMC Facilities Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:10 PM
Creation date
5/12/2004 3:16:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/19/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MWMC FACILITIES PLAN <br /> <br />TABLE 6.2.1-4 <br />Facility Requirements for Alternative 2 al 2025 <br />MWMC Facilities Plan, Eugene-Springfield <br /> <br /> Total Required <br /> Secondary Capacity Capacity <br /> NPDES Permit Condition Aeration Basin Clarifiers (mgd) (mgd) <br /> <br />DWMM 2 (4 cells each) 12 60 59 <br />DWMW 3 (4 cells each) 16 86 86 <br />WWMM 3 (4 cells each) 12 119 111 <br />WWMW 3 (4 cells each) 16 167 165 <br /> <br />Results <br />The capital cost comparison and non-monetary comparison are summarized in Table 6.2.1-5. <br /> <br />TABLE 6.2.1-5 <br />Comparison of Facility Requirements, Cost, and Non-monetary Evaluation <br />MWMC Facilities Plan, Eugene-Springfield <br /> <br /> Additional Aeration Additional Secondary Cost <br /> Basins Required Clarifiers Required (millions of Nonmonetary <br />NPDES Permit Condition for 2025 for 2025 dollars) Evaluation <br /> <br />Alternative 1 0 2 $19.3 27 <br />Alternative 2 1 8 $39 15 <br /> <br />Alternative 1 is the recommended alternative for secondary treatment improvements. This <br />alternative provides the following advantages: <br /> <br />· Increases bioreactor capacity by increasing the mixed liquor concentration <br />· Modifications can be constructed within the existing infrastructure footprint <br />· Process reduces loading to the secondary clarifiers <br />· Improves sludge settleability and provides for its control <br />· Will provide consistent and complete nitrification <br />· Provides process flexibility for seasonal operation <br />· Operation is more efficient and provides financial benefits <br /> <br />In addition, alternative 1 is far more cost-effective and maximizes the use of existing <br />facilities. <br /> <br />6.2.2 Secondary Clarification Enhancements <br />As stated in section 6.2.1, the WPCF will need to increase its secondary treatment peak <br />capacity to address the projected increase in wastewater flows and the ever-changing and <br />more restrictive NPDES effluent limitations. The current peak wet weather secondary <br /> <br />6-10 MWIvIC_6.0_REV11.DOC <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.