Laserfiche WebLink
I. INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE AND NEED <br /> <br /> facility expand both its base secondary treatment capacity and its primary treatment <br /> capacity for the plant to meet its NPDES permit. Regardless, the MWMC adopted a <br /> WWFMP policy that facilities are to be constructed in order to increase the level of full <br /> secondary treatment from 103 mgd to 130 mgd. Current effluent blending policy is still <br /> evolving; however, blending now provides the most cost-effective approach to treating peak <br /> flows. A key underlying assumption in the preparation of this plan is that some level of <br /> effluent blending will continue to be an acceptable approach to treating the peak wet <br /> weather flows. If the DEQ does not accept this approach in reviewing this plan, contingency <br /> solutions that could be implemented are included and evaluated. However, the cost of these <br /> facilities would be significantly greater than those recommended in this plan. <br /> <br /> 1.6.3 Technology Drivers <br /> The original treatment facility was constructed in 1984, implementing the appropriate <br /> technologies of the era. New technologies have emerged since that time, and will continue <br /> to emerge to address both existing and future wastewater treatment needs. New <br /> technologies may have the advantage of providing better environmental results, providing <br /> more cost-effective treatment, lowering operational and maintenance requirements and <br /> costs, and other benefits. Technologies available for implementation today were evaluated <br /> as part of the planning process and are recommended where they meet cost-effectiveness, <br /> performance, and capacity criteria to meet the future regional wastewater treatment needs <br /> for MWMC's service area. <br /> <br /> 1.6.4 Existing WPCF Issues <br />A number of concerns at the WPCF were evaluated as part of the planning process to <br />identify improvements to the existing facilities that would provide operational efficiencies, <br />cost savings, reduced risks/liabilities, and improved worker and neighborhood safety. In <br />some areas, the original capacity of equipment may now be limiting operations (influent <br />pumping capacity is inadequate, screen trough sluice capacity is inadequate, etc.) Other <br />needs are simply a result of aging or outdated equipment (i.e., pumps, valves, gates, <br />communication systems, etc.). Process inefficiencies provide further bottlenecks to efficient <br />operations (grease accumulation in influent screening conveyance, limited modes of <br />operation in aeration basins, high operation and maintenance in the existing grit chambers, <br />reduction in struvite scaling, etc.). Finally, the MWMC evaluated the current chlorine <br />disinfection system and the available alternatives, and directed staff to include the <br />conversion to a safer system using sodium hypochlorite. All of these needs must be <br />addressed in order to provide the expansion capability necessary to meet future growth <br />needs and to provide the most cost-effective and safe treatment facility operations. <br /> <br />1.7 Project Goals and Objectives <br /> <br />The goals of this Facilities Plan are to build on the previous planning efforts that have been <br />ongoing since 1996 in order to develop a practical and cost-effective set of capital <br />improvements necessary to meet community needs and minimum environmental standards <br />for all MWMC facilities for the next 20 years. The Facilities Plan presents comprehensive <br />and defensible identification and evaluation of available capital improvement strategy <br />alternatives, and recommendations that: <br /> <br />MWMC_1.0_REV13.DOC <br /> <br /> <br />