My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A-MWMC Facilities Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-05/19/04WS
>
Item A-MWMC Facilities Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:10 PM
Creation date
5/12/2004 3:16:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/19/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MWMC WASTEWATER FACILITIES PLAN AND SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE - <br /> RESPONSE TO APRIL 2, 2004, QUESTIONS FROM EUGENE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE <br /> <br /> Dry Season Maximum Month Flow <br /> Historical and Projected <br /> <br /> o30~E40gs0~ ~ <br /> 20 [~ 2004 Facilities Plan-*-DEQ Methodology <br /> 10 1997 Master Plan -x-Historical Data <br /> 0 ' ' ' ' I .... I .... I <br /> 1990 2000 2010 2020 <br /> Year <br /> <br />Also shown in this graph are the projections from a previous study (1997 Eugene- <br />Springfield Water Pollution Control Facility Master Plan) and projections calculated using <br />guidelines provided by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The 1997 <br />study projected higher flows relative to the 2004 Facilities Plan projections because it <br />considered a smaller historical data set that happened to be collected during a period of <br />higher-than-average rainfall. Projections based on the DEQ guidelines, which result from <br />historical rainfall data, are also higher than the 2004 Facilities Plan projections, which are <br />based on historical WPCF flow data. MWMC is working with DEQ staff to determine <br />whether the MWMC methodology results in an adequate dry weather flow projection, will <br />provide adequate reliability in treating peak wet weather flows, and whether the historical <br />methodology used by MWMC can be accepted as an alternative to the DEQ guidelines. <br /> <br />3. Comment: The 40% growth projection is inconsistent with the growth rate used <br /> in other planning activities (e.g., transportation, water, and power supply). <br />The growth projection used for 2004 is about 36.7% at 2025. Typically, wastewater planning <br />uses population projections deeeloped by the local planning jurisdiction(s). In this case, the <br />Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) and its adopted functional <br />plans have provided the basis for projecting population growth and land usage through the <br />year 2015. Because the MWMC Facilities Plan is intended to serve the two cities plus the <br />population in the River Road/Santa Clara area that is provided with sanitary sewerage <br />through the year 2025, a population projection beyond the timeframe of the Metro Plan <br />projection is necessary and required by DEQ for a 20-year plan. <br /> <br />Population projections used in the 2004 Facilities Plan were determined assuming a 1.59% <br />annual growth rate applied to the year 2002 population. This growth rate is based on <br />historical growth rates for the community since 1990 (see graph). The graph also shows <br />population as far back as 1970 for historical perspective. This is a downward revision of the <br /> <br />CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RESPONSES FINAL.DOC PAGE 3 OF 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.