Laserfiche WebLink
3) Data collection and reporting work of the auditor and citizen review board; and <br />4) Ongoing role of the Police Commission with regard to the auditor and review board. <br /> <br />Short-Term Decisions Discussion <br />The Charter amendment approved by voters in November only authorizes the council to hire and <br />supervise an independent police auditor. The City Council has not yet formally stated its intention <br />to implement that authority, nor has it formally stated it will also appoint a citizen review board. <br /> <br />At the present time, there is no budgetary authority in the FY06 budget to recruit or hire the <br />auditor. A timeline for the recruitment and hiring process for the auditor needs to be developed. <br />It is estimated that the recruitment and selection processes will take three to four months from <br />start to having the auditor on the job. <br /> <br />The Police Commission has worked on a job description and a candidate profile. These need to <br />be agreed upon the City Council in order to begin the recruitment and selection processes. <br /> <br />The recruitment and selection process needs to be agreed upon by the City Council. For the <br />position of City Manager, also hired, supervised and evaluated by the City Council, an outside <br />recruitment firm was engaged to conduct the candidate search and narrow the applicant pool to a <br />final few candidates to be interviewed. The Police Commission has developed elements to include <br />in a job description and a candidate profile. Once the recruitment process is determined, the <br />council will need to determine if the information is sufficient or if additional information is needed. <br /> <br />Policy and legislation regarding the auditor and citizen review board needs to be developed to <br />address items such as removal of the auditor, codification of the review board, and autonomy of <br />the review board itself. The Police Commission, which has been instrumental in the development <br />of the external review model approved the by the voters, could continue to assist the council at <br />this time with regard to the development of immediate or overarching policy or ordinance issues. <br /> <br />Long-Term Decisions Discussion <br />The City Council is authorized to hire an independent auditor. An issue to be decided is the status <br />of the auditor; that is, is the auditor to be a regular employee or a contract employee, similar in <br />status to the Municipal Judge. <br /> <br />The Charter amendment authorizes the appointment of a citizen review board, but does not <br />identify how the board members will be recruited and selected. The Police Commission report of <br />July 25, 2005, makes suggestions on this topic, but the City Council needs to agree on these <br />issues prior to the appointment of the citizen review board. Further, the Charter amendment <br />states that the citizen review board may oversee and evaluate the work of the independent <br />auditor. <br /> <br />In the Charter language, the auditor may receive and classify complaints about sworn police <br />officers. A reporting system which provides protections to all involved in such complaints, as <br />well as accurately capturing information must be developed. A further issue is how this <br />information is made public and available to the larger community. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060118\S060118Ba.DOC <br /> <br />