Laserfiche WebLink
that there was a strong interest in gaining public input on this issue. He noted that some people felt that City <br />Hall should be open to the public and that some members of the public could find uniformed officers to be <br />intimidating. He reiterated that the EPD facility would be required by law to be constructed to higher <br />standards. He reviewed some consolidation models that could be considered. <br /> <br />City Manager’s Office employee Jan Bohman was photographing the process in order to document it. Mr. <br />Kelly objected to this, stating that he “had a problem with City staff spending energy on taking pictures.” <br />No further pictures were taken. <br /> <br />Mr. Hardy stated that the next step would be to gain public input and identify the police service delivery <br />model that the community wanted to utilize. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked if the new substations had to meet the higher seismic standards. Mr. Hardy replied that <br />anything new had to be built to those standards. Ms. Ortiz thought there was a difference between a <br />precinct and a substation and that substations did not have to meet the higher standard. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman felt that before the next steps could be looked into, the City needed to consider what it could <br />afford. She did not believe that the consolidation issue was germane to the discussion of the building issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly expressed appreciation for the models the council had been presented with. He did not believe he <br />had sufficient material on which to base a decision at this point, however. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé commented that he was uncertain as to what the cart was and what the horse was. He asked if the <br />police chief was ready to get out in front of this. <br /> <br />Police Chief Bob Lehner responded that there were more models to consider, one of which would locate <br />police administration in City Hall and then deliver services from two precincts. He averred that the more <br />patrols were housed in neighborhoods, the closer the City was to having a precinct model for policing. He <br />stated that this was the most expensive model for policing. He pointed out, though, that the second most <br />expensive model was to have all of the services in one location downtown. He added that locating <br />everything together would also cost the most per square foot. He asked how much money the community <br />would want to spend. He stressed that the discussion was primarily a financial one. He stated that the <br />current model, one with a downtown station and public safety stations, was likely the most fiscally prudent. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy asked if the precinct models were required to be built to seismic standards. Chief Lehner <br />responded that when speaking of a precinct, it was understood to be a place from which patrol cars were <br />deployed. Because of this, the precincts would have to meet the higher seismic standards. He guessed that <br />the Records Division, as an example, would not be required to be housed in a structure built to the higher <br />standards. <br /> <br />Ms. Cooper called this conflict a perfect example of some of the quandaries that would have to be <br />addressed. She underscored that the public wants a high level of service and at the same time people want <br />government to be financially conservative. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked how it had been determined that keeping the EPD in the downtown area would be the <br />most expensive model. She commented that having two precincts might be a good idea, but she wanted the <br />one on the south side of the river to be connected to City Hall. She wanted the police to be housed in the <br />same area as the elected officials. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 19, 2005 Page 5 <br /> Workshop <br /> <br />