Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ATTACHMENT C <br /> <br />OPTION 3 – Tax on Increases from Legislative Changes <br /> <br /> <br />Description: <br /> When the council adopts changes to land use regulations or plans, depending on <br />the nature of those changes, it is possible that the changes reduce the fair market value of <br />particular properties, but it is equally possible that the changes increase the fair market of certain <br />properties. For example, if the council amends the land use code to expand the types of uses <br />allowed in a particular zone, or relaxes a height or setback restriction, or increases the maximum <br />density for a particular type of zone, the value of certain properties may increase. This option <br />would involve imposition of a tax on the increase in fair market value resulting from an <br />ordinance that amends the land use code or makes a legislative change to the Metro plan or to a <br />refinement plan. <br /> <br />Is the fee/tax legally permissible, or somehow preempted (by statute or constitution)? <br /> <br /> <br />As noted previously, the City’s home-rule powers authorize the council to adopt any type of fee <br />or charge that is not preempted by federal or state law and that does not violate the U.S. or <br />Oregon Constitutions. Neither the Constitution nor state statutes would preempt the council <br />from adopting such a tax or fee. Therefore, the council has the power to enact a tax on the <br />increases in fair market value resulting from legislative changes to the land use code or to land <br />use plans. <br /> <br />Would voter approval be required before adopting the fee/tax? <br /> <br /> <br />No. Generally, voter approval is required only for certain taxes that are imposed on real property <br />and subject to the limits of Measure 5. Other types of taxes (like the City’s telecommunications <br />privilege tax, or an income tax or gross receipts tax) do not require voter approval. (In certain <br />counties and cities in Oregon, the home-rule charter may include a provision that requires voter <br />approval. Eugene’s Charter does not.) However, since the tax would be adopted through an <br />ordinance, it would be subject to referendum. <br /> <br />How would the fee/tax be administered and calculated? <br /> <br /> <br />In order to impose this type of tax, the City would need to make two sets of determinations. The <br />first set determinations would be policy decisions to be made by the council. The second set <br />would involve administrative decisions, presumably made by staff or a hearings official. <br /> <br />First, the council would need to determine the amount of the tax that would be imposed. Like the <br />first two options, the tax could be a specified percentage of the increase in fair market value. <br />This rate could be structured a number of different ways. The simplest way to structure the rate <br />would be as a straight percentage of any increase in value; for example, the tax could be 25% of <br />the amount that the property increased in value. More complicated structures could include <br />exempting a certain portion of the increase and taxing the remainder. In this latter alternative, <br />the council could structure the tax as follows: determine the increase in value, deduct from that <br />L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060125\S060125A.doc <br /> <br /> <br />