Ordinance No. 19466 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

or other source in order to administer the provisions of section 9.601 ~~j subsections ~a} and ~b}, if the base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with subsection ~I} of this section. ~ej Obtaining and recording the actual elevation din relation to mean sea level} of the lowest floor including basement} of all new or substantially improved structures, whether or not the struc- ture contains abasement where base flood elevation data is pro- vided through the Flood Insurance Study or required as in subsec- t~on ~d} of this sect~an; ~fj verifying and recording the actual elevation din relation to mean sea level} and maintaining the floodproofing certifications required ~n subsect~an ~~} of this section for all new or substan- tially improved floodproofed structures; ~gj Notifying adjacent communities and the Division of State Lands prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and submitting evidence of such notification to the Federal Insurance Administration; ~hj Requiring that maintenance is provided within the altered or relocated portion of a watercourse so that the flood carrying capacity is not diminished; and ~ij Maintain for public inspection all records pertaining to the provisions of sections 9,60 to 9.607. ~3} An applicant may appeal the building official's denial of a development permit application in the manner provided in section 9.742 of this code. 9.606 S ecial Flood Hazard areas - variances. The building official ma a rove condition ~ ~ .y pp ally approve, yr deny an appl~cat~an for a vari- ance from the provisions of sections 9.602 to 9.607, except that no variance shal 1 be allowed within a fl oodway. The bui 1 di ng official's decision shal l be based on the following criteria: ~a} Compliance with applicable provisions of section 9.740 of this code; ~bj Consideration of al 1 technical eval uati ans, other rel e- vant factors and standards set forth in section 9.601, and; 1. The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the ~n0ury of others; ~. The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage; 3. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; 4. The importance of the services provided by the pro- posed facility to the community; 5. The necessity to the facility of a waterfront loca- ti on, where applicable; 6. The availability of alternative locations for the proposed use which are not subject to (loading or erasion dam- age; 7. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development; Ordinance - 4