Laserfiche WebLink
levels. These concerns accelerated in the 1950’s and 1960’s as growth continued outside city <br />limits in Bethel, River Road, Santa Clara, North Springfield, Thurston, and Douglas Gardens. <br /> Problems of sprawl, leapfrog development, loss of farmland, rapid development during a <br />period of economic recovery, construction of interstate freeways, unequal level of services, <br />fragmentation of government, and unequal taxation were the fodder for our modern land use <br />planning program. <br /> <br /> <br />C. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION <br /> <br /> The late 1970’s and early 1980's was an era of unprecedented intergovernmental cooperation. <br />The Transportation (T-2000) Plan was adopted, the Eugene/Springfield Metro Plan was <br />adopted with the formation of the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) for policy direction <br />and dispute resolution, and the Wastewater Plan was adopted - leading to formation of the <br />MWMC, regionalization of wastewater treatment, and passage of a local bond to fund the <br />local 25% share of the converted plant and major lines necessary to convey Springfield <br />wastewater to the new regional plant. <br /> <br /> Following those early successes and the deep recession of the late 70's and early 80's, an <br />intergovernmental review of urban service delivery was undertaken. The review was <br />motivated by Commissioner Peter DeFazio. Commissioner John Ball chaired the study that <br />led to intergovernmental agreements including the transfer of roads to cities upon annexation <br />and development of county road fund sharing formulas, the transfer of county administration <br />of planning and building permitting to cities, and the transfer of urban county parks to Eugene <br />and Springfield (for Willamalane). <br /> <br /> <br />D. CURRENT REALITIES <br /> <br /> The second Periodic Review of the Metro Plan is now complete, we are in the midst of a <br />severe recession and the metropolitan area is dealing with the prospects of the region’s <br />population doubling during the next 50 years. If the area doesn’t want to replicate what many <br />view as mistakes in other highly developed areas, densities must increase, redevelopment must <br />occur while livability is maintained and there must be an orderly and efficient provision for the <br />necessary public services. <br /> <br /> Currently, intergovernmental cooperation is needed as hospitals expand and relocate to <br />address the growing health needs of the region. Schools are consolidating, rebuilding and <br />relocating to meet the changing demographics. Transportation facilities are being designed <br />for the future transportation needs. Destination recreational facilities are being expanded <br />while new ones are being planned. The Metro Plan partners struggle to find ways to finance <br /> <br />the many increasing demands placed on government as the region grows. <br /> <br /> As cities grow, they inherit the fringe from the county - and a new fringe is formed - and with <br />cars, the fringe influence expands further outward. The land division and settlement patterns <br /> 3 <br />