My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 19593
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1980s No. 18550-19659
>
Ordinance No. 19593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:45:41 PM
Creation date
3/3/2009 1:16:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
19593
Document_Title
Ordinance concerning the Uniform Fire Code; amending Sections 8.190 and 8.200 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and declaring an emergency.
Adopted_Date
1/23/1989
Approved Date
1/23/1989
CMO_Effective_Date
1/23/1989
Signer
Jeffrey R. Miller
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8. Haw does the activity impact the hazardous characteristics of <br />the material? Consider vapors released, or hazards otherwise exposed. <br />9. what must the material be protected from? Consider other mater- <br />ials, temperature, shock pressure, etc. <br />10. what effects of the material must people and the environment be <br />protected from? <br />11. How can protection be accomplished? Consider: <br />a. proper containers and equipment, <br />b. separation by distance ar construction, <br />c. enclosure in cabinets or roams, <br />d. spill control, drainage and containment, <br />e. control systems -ventilation, special electrical, detec- <br />tion and alarm, extinguishment, explosion venting, limit controls, <br />exhaust scrubbers, excess flow control, <br />f. administrative ~operatianal} controls - signage, ignition <br />source control, security, personnel training, established proce- <br />dures, storage plans, emergency plans. <br />Evolution of the hazard is a strongly subjective process, therefore, the <br />person charged with this responsibility must gather as much relevant <br />data as possible so that the decision will be justified and within the <br />limits prescribed in laws, policies and standards. It may be necessary <br />to cause the responsible persons in charge to have tests made by quali- <br />f~ed.persons and/or testing laboratories to support contentions that a <br />particular material or process is or is not hazardous. See UFC Section <br />2.201. <br />IV. LIST OF "EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES" AND THEIR THRESHOLD PLANNING <br />QUANTITIES. <br />As established by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, <br />published in the Federal Register Vol. 52, No. 71, April 22, 1987, and codi- <br />fied as 40 CFR 355. <br />NOTE: Threshold Planning Quantities TPQ} for solids. Extremely <br />hazardous substances that are solids are subject to either of two TPQs 4e.g., <br />500/10,000 lbs.}. The lower quantity applies only if the solid exists in <br />powdered form and has a particle size of less than 100 microns, or is handled <br />in solution or molten form, or meets the criteria for a National Fire Protec- <br />tion Association ~NFPA} rating of 2, 3, or 4 for reactivity. If the solid <br />does not meet any of these criteria, it is subject to the higher TPQ. <br />CHEMICAL NAME TPQ albs.} CHEMICAL NAME TPQ albs.} <br />Acetone Cyanohydrin....... 1,000 Azinphos-Methyl.........10/10,000 <br />Acetone Th~osem~carbazide. 1,OOO/10,000 Bacitracin ..............10,000 <br />Acrolein .................. 500 Benzal Chloride......... 500 <br />Ordinance - 95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.