My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Police Auditor Ordinance Review Report
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 03/09/09 Work Session
>
Item B: Police Auditor Ordinance Review Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:15:11 PM
Creation date
3/6/2009 10:30:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Police Auditor and Acting Chief of Police, the committee emphasized the need for an <br />oversight system that functions well in all circumstances. To that end, PAORC <br />recommends to the Council and the City Manager that they make explicit their desire that <br />the Auditor and Chief develop cooperative and collaborative policies and procedures for <br />effective oversight based upon the principles of fairness, thoroughness, appropriate <br />transparency, and a lack of bias in processing and investigating complaints. <br />Review of the Council’s Supervision of the Police Auditor <br />The committee wishes to express to Council that the ‘day to day’ supervision of the <br />Auditor’s office should reside with a small subcommittee of the Council; for example, the <br />Council Officers. This would allow the Council to be proactive instead of reactive as <br />issues arise. We believe that the current circumstance makes it difficult for the full <br />Council to give the attention and direction that the Auditor’s office needs. <br /> VI. Conclusions and Next Steps <br />The work of the Police Auditor Ordinance Review Committee has been focused on the <br />thth <br />proposed amendments from the November 10 and 17 Council meetings from 2008. <br />Our work with these amendments is part of the larger work of the Council, the City, and <br />the community in achieving a successful civilian oversight system for Eugene. As <br />previously noted, PAORC did not feel it had sufficient time to thoughtfully and <br />thoroughly deliberate on all of the items included in its charge, and is willing to <br />reconvene should the Council wish it to continue its work on the remaining items. <br />It comes as no surprise to PAORC members that civilian oversight is an involved and <br />multi-faceted system requiring attention and adjustment as time passes and our model <br />matures. We feel our proposed revisions to Ordinance 20374 and the recommendations <br />we have made are in keeping with the charge we received from the Council. It is our hope <br />that the Council will consider implementing these revisions and recommendations in the <br />spirit with which they are presented. These suggestions are intended for improvement <br />with the ultimate goal of the success of civilian review, and increased community <br />confidence and appreciation of policing in Eugene. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.