My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Action: Discussion and Approval of Non-Unanimous IGR Positions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 03/09/09 Meeting
>
Item 5: Action: Discussion and Approval of Non-Unanimous IGR Positions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:48:07 PM
Creation date
3/6/2009 11:55:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Requires owner of golf cart or substantially similar vehicle operated within jurisdiction of <br />road authority to display decal with identifying number issued by road authority. <br /> Requires golf carts or substantially similar vehicles to display slow-moving vehicle emblems <br />when operated on any highway. <br /> Expands offense of operation of low-speed vehicle in prohibited area to include any person <br />who operates golf cart or substantially similar vehicle on any highway with designated speed <br />of greater than 25 miles per hour. <br />Sponsored by: Representative GALIZIO; Representative STIEGLER (at the request of Chuck Fessler, King <br />City Police Chief) <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2400.dir/hb2492.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />E.Cushman D. Schulz EPD-ADM 2/16/2009 Neutral <br />Comments: <br />This bill would expand the statutory authority for a road authority to permit golf carts "or <br />substantially similar vehicles" on roadways. It would not require this, but would allow the road <br />authority of a jurisdiction to do so, and to establish restrictions around the operation of such <br />vehicles, if it felt that such action was beneficial for the local jurisdiction involved. The bill was <br />introduced at the request of the Police Chief of King City. <br />Although we do not believe that such a practice would be consistent with traffic safety here, we <br />do not oppose allowing other jurisdictions to do so on a case-by-case basis, since this is <br />consistent with the philosophy of allowing local jurisdictions to make decisions on actions which <br />affect them. We would oppose the bill if it were amended to make this provision mandatory for all <br />jurisdictions. <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Tom Larsen Tom Larsen PWM 1/30/2009 Neutral <br />Comments: <br />The bill allows cities to adopt ordinances that would permit golf carts and similar vehicles to <br />operate on roads posted at 25 MPH and lower. We have serious safety concerns about <br />operating cars and golf carts together on the same road. The ordinance allowed under this rule <br />will need to establish standards for regulating and identifying the other similar vehicles. Under <br />the provisions of this bill golf carts and similar vehicles will not be able to cross the Willamette <br />River or use much of the arterial and collector street system. The ordinace process will be a very <br />complicated. While I strongly recommend that we not enact the ordinance permitted by this law, I <br />am not opposed to other cities in different circumstances passing ordinances that work for them. <br />HB 2499 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to motorcycle helmets. <br />Title: <br />Requires only persons under 21 years of age to wear motorcycle helmets. <br />Sponsored by: Representatives BAILEY, FREEMAN; Representative MATTHEWS <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2400.dir/hb2499.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />E. Cushman D. Schulz EPD-ADM 2/12/2009 Pri 2 Yes V. C7 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />We strongly oppose this bill, which would require that only persons under 21 years of age wear <br />helmets while operating motorcycles. <br />Statistics from the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration and the Oregon <br />Department of Transportation have shown that simply wearing a protective helmet while <br />operating a motorcycle will substantially increase a person's chances of surviving a motorcycle <br />crash. The proposed legislation is suggesting that only motorcycle operators under the age of 21 <br />be required to wear helmets; however, this particular demographic (21 & under) does not have <br />the highest percentage of motorcycle crash fatalities. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.