Laserfiche WebLink
A 2005 NHTSA publication identified the age group of 20 to 29 year olds as having the highest <br />percentage of motorcycle crash fatalities. In that same study, the age group with the second <br />highest fatal crash rate is the 40-49 age group, with the 30-39 coming in the third highest. In a <br />2006 NHSTA study, all of the research data used showed an increase over the past 10 years in <br />the number of fatal motorcycle crashes involving riders 40 years of age and older. That same <br />study indicated that about two-thirds (66%) of the fatally injured motorcycle riders in states <br />without universal helmet laws in 2004 were not wearing their helmets compared to 15% in states <br />with universal helmet laws. <br />In 2004, motorcycles made up nearly 2.4 percent of all registered vehicles in the United States <br />and accounted for only 0.3% of all vehicle miles traveled. In comparison, motorcycle riders <br />accounted for 5.3% of total traffic crash fatalities in 1995, with that number increasing to 9.4% of <br />the total traffic crash fatalities in 2004. Per vehicle mile traveled in 2004, motorcycle riders were <br />about 34 times more likely than passenger car occupants to die in a motor vehicle traffic crash. <br />And the helmet law does not only affect motorcycle operators. By reducing the number of deaths <br />and the severity of injuries suffered by motorcycle operators, other drivers involved in these <br />crashes are spared some of the trauma of being involved in a crash involving a fatality or serious <br />injury, and the burden on the overall health care system is reduced. <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Glen Potter Glen Potter EFD 1/30/2009 Pri 2 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />This bill would relax Oregon's existing law requiring all motorcycle operators to wear a helmet, <br />instead applying the requirement only to operators under 21 years of age. Helmets save lives. <br />HB 2615 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to urban renewal. <br />Title: <br />Requires majority approval by county governing body of urban renewal plan proposed, <br />substantially amended or extended in area by city of 300,000 within county boundaries. <br /> Permits urban renewal agency to use urban renewal moneys to provide social services in <br />urban renewal area. <br /> Requires urban renewal agency that proposes to provide social services to describe <br />services and to report results of study comparing economic viability of plan with and without <br />services. <br />Sponsored by: Representative KAHL <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2600.dir/hb2615.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Richie Weinman PDD-DEV 2/13/2009 Pri 1 Yes II. A3 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />This directly relates to our legislative policy that states "Eugene opposes additonal consent <br />requirements for new or amended urban renewal plans. <br />It also relates to our legislative policy that "Eugene opposes mandating that a portion of urban <br />renewal funds be spent on particular types of projects" <br />This bill would give the county significant power over the City of Eugene and would take away <br />City Council power to decided how to best use funds. <br />HB 2616 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to local government tobacco taxes; prescribing an effective date. <br />Title: <br />Removes prohibition against local government imposition of taxes on cigarettes and tobacco <br />products. <br /> Applies to cigarettes and tobacco products distributed after effective date of Act. <br /> Takes effect on 91st day following adjournment sine die. <br />4 <br />