Laserfiche WebLink
SB 440 would allow any increased revenue to be used for any city services, not just the uses the <br />curent tax is limited to. <br />SB 0445 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to bonds. <br />Title: <br />Authorizes issuance of bonds for transportation projects of statewide significance. Specifies <br />sources of repayment. <br />Sponsored by: Senator GEORGE, Representatives THATCHER, WINGARD <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb0400.dir/sb0445.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Eric Jones Eric Jones PW-ADM 2/11/2009 Pri 3 Yes III. A1 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />The intended use of state highway funds in this bill is identical to those in SB 376: five highway <br />projects in the Dundee-Salem corridor. In SB 445 the justification of expenditures is changed <br />slightly to define these as projects of "statewide significance." Staff currently is recommending a <br />"monitor" position on SB 376; however an oppose position may be more appropriate given the <br />introduction of SB 445. <br />Both bills, by definition, include no projects that benefit Eugene or Lane County. Therefore, this <br />reviewer sees no reason to support either bill. <br />Unlike SB 376, which, if approved, would likely compromise or eliminate the possibility of funding <br />projects in Eugene and Lane County by sucking up lottery bonding authority, SB 445 introduces a <br />fundamental inequity into the state's highway trust fund. Specifically, SB 445 would take 1 cent of <br />the state's 24-cent gas tax to underwrite bonding to pay for these five projects. If this money <br />comes "off the top" it will reduce the revenues available to the highway trust fund and the <br />corresponding allocations to cities, including Eugene. <br />Sen. George has gained support from Reps. Thatcher and Wingard on SB 445. While it is <br />undertandable that these lawmakers, all of whom have constituents in the project areas, look to <br />provide benefits in their home districts, the City of Eugene should vigorously oppose both the <br />presumptive "earmarking" of general state revenues as well as any financing approach that would <br />inequitably reduce the funding shared statewide by cities and counties. <br />It should also be noted that the relating clause is extremely broad: "relating to bonds." <br />Given the likelihood that this bill will be broadly opposed around the state, this reviewer <br />recommends a position of priority 3 opposed, recognizing that if the bill should begin to advance it <br />should opposed vigorously. <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Larry Hill Larry Hill CS-FIN 2/11/2009 Pri 3 Yes III. A Oppose <br />Comments: <br />SB 445 would assign top priority for state funding from the State Highway Trust Fund to five <br />specific highway projects in the northern Willamette Valley area. Funding for these projects would <br />preceed any distribution of State Highway Trust Fund shares to cities and counties. <br />SB 0446 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to energy technology in public buildings. <br />Title: <br />Provides that public improvement contract for construction or certain reconstruction or major <br />renovation of public building is considered to contain amount equal to at least 1.5 percent of <br />total contract price for inclusion of certain types of energy technology. Provides exceptions. <br />Sponsored by: Senator TELFER, Representative WHISNANT (at the request of Deschutes County) (at the <br />request of Deschutes County) <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb0400.dir/sb0446.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Mike Penwell Mike Penwell CS-FAC 2/17/2009 Pri 2 No Support <br />Comments: <br />11 <br />