My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Discuss and Approve Non-Unanimous IGR Positions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 04/13/09 Meeting
>
Item 3: Discuss and Approve Non-Unanimous IGR Positions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:43:15 PM
Creation date
4/10/2009 12:43:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/13/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
online sexual corruption of a child) to include telephone text messaging. Obviously, such <br />text messaging is becoming a much more prevalent means of communication, and <br />passage of this bill will allow statutory definitions to keep up with technology and current <br />practices. <br />HB 2733 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to asphaltic concrete pavement mix. <br />Title: Requires Department of Transportation to include asphaltic concrete pavement mix <br />composed of up to five percent recycled asphaltic shingles in materials selected for <br />construction, maintenance and operation of state highways. <br />Sponsored by: Representative SCHAUFLER <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2700.dir/hb2733.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Eric Jones Eric Jones PW-ADM 3/20/2009 Pri 3 No No Monitor <br />Comments: <br />Paul Klope and Ethan Nelson have worked out a thorough and centrist recommendation <br />on this bill. Their position acknowledges the value of recycling efforts (asphalt shingles in <br />this case) and provides opportunities and incentives for continued research into this area <br />without prescribing a specific approach that may prove to have fatal flaws. I fully support <br />their recommendations. <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Ethan Nelson PDD-BPS 3/16/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesVII. A4 Monitor <br />Comments: <br />HB 2733 proposes to mandate the use of recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) in all new <br />ODOT road projects. City of Eugene Solid Waste and Public Works Engineering staff <br />have discussed in length the benefits and challenges of this bill. <br />We support the goals of the bill to provide a more sustainable solution to disposal of <br />asphalt shingles and to reduce loading on our landfills. This is supported by Council <br />Legislative Policies: VII A1 Climate Change, VII A4a, b, and d Solid Waste and <br />Recycling. Annually, Eugene discards over 5,830 tons (4.5% of total discards) of asphalt <br />shingles and tar roofing paper into the landfill. While this bill would help to redirect part of <br />this waste stream from the landfill, there are other technical considerations. We believe <br />that the wording of the bill should be revised to provide more detail and allow ODOT <br />engineers the professional discretion and flexibility as to which surfacing method and <br />material is most appropriate for a given road type. <br />Use of asphalt shingles in asphalt concrete is in an experimental state, and more <br />research and experimentation work needs to be done to insure that use of RAS is <br />successful. Rather than require use of shingles at some set percentage, and risk either <br />failure or limiting the use of recycled shingles, we believe the bill should be rewritten to <br />direct ODOT to conduct research and testing and to construct pilot projects to determine <br />the appropriate use of RAS in asphalt pavement mixes for all classifications of streets, <br />highways and freeways. <br />It would also be a good idea to set a completion time for the research and testing, far <br />enough in the future to allow for qualitative data, but on an aggressive time table to move <br />the technology forward. We recommend a 4 year study with progress reports to <br />legislature at the next two sessions. <br />We suggest that the bill also encourage ODOT to research other opportunities for reuse <br />of RAS on their public infrastructure projects and report their findings. We suggest the bill <br />include a provision that ODOT educate and assist other public agencies and private <br />companies on reuse of RAS in paving projects. We suggest the bill also include a <br />requirement for the State to develop an incentive program for cities, counties and other <br />public agencies and for private companies for use of RAS in pilot projects with reporting <br />requirements back to ODOT. <br />The City of Eugene should support a revised version of this bill that addresses the <br />concerns identified above. <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.