My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Discuss and Approve Non-Unanimous IGR Positions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 04/13/09 Meeting
>
Item 3: Discuss and Approve Non-Unanimous IGR Positions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:43:15 PM
Creation date
4/10/2009 12:43:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/13/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HB 2961 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to local requirements for the construction of structures. <br />Title: Allows municipality to impose local requirements for construction of new structures that <br />are more stringent than state building code. <br />Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON CONSUMER PROTECTION <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2900.dir/hb2961.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Mark Whitmill Mark Whitmill PDD-BPS 3/24/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesIV. B Neutral <br />Comments: <br />The state building code establishes uniform standards for construction throughout the <br />state. Municipalities are allowed to enact or enforce ordinances, rules or regulations that <br />relate to the same matters encompassed by the state building code but which provide <br />different requirements, but only if authorized by the Director of the Department of <br />Consumer and Business Services. <br />The amendment would significantly undermine the idea of a state-wide code. <br />Municipalities would be allowed to locally adopt more stringent construction standards <br />than those in the state code without approval from DCBS. Many if not most developers, <br />builders and trades people work in more than one jurisdiction. This bill could result in <br />confusing and possibly costly differences in code requirements from jurisdiction to <br />jurisdiction. <br />This bill would enable the city to more easily amend or modify the building code, if <br />desired. But it would be at the expense of state-wide consistency and maybe not in the <br />best interest of the general public. <br />HB 2962 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to residential housing. <br />Title: <br />Requires Director of Department of Consumer and Business Services to adopt rules <br />requiring certificate of occupancy for new residential structure or zero-lot-line dwelling. <br />Requires director to adopt rules requiring general contractor or owner to present list of <br />contractors and subcontractors before issuance of certificate of occupancy for new <br />residential structure or zero-lot-line dwelling. Makes violation of rules subject to civil <br />penalty, not to exceed $5,000. <br /> Requires that Construction Contractors Board information notice to property owners <br />about construction responsibilities include information about subcontractor information <br />and certificate of occupancy requirements. Requires contractor constructing new <br />residential structure or zero-lot-line dwelling to provide property owner with list of <br />subcontractors for structure or dwelling. Makes failure to provide list violation subject to <br />civil penalty, not to exceed $5,000. <br />Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON CONSUMER PROTECTION <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2900.dir/hb2962.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Mark Whitmill PDD-BPS 3/17/2009 Pri 3 No No Neutral <br />Comments: <br />Bill would require that a general contractor or owner building a new residential structure <br />maintain a list of all subcontractors involved in the construction, including names, contact <br />information and licensing information, and provide that list to the City (Building & Permit <br />Services) before obtaining a certificate of occupancy. A general contractor would also be <br />required to provide that list to the property owner. <br />The intent appears to be to increase accountability for poor workmanship or faulty <br />construction. <br />There would be some staff time involved collecting and processing the information, which <br />would presumably be covered by current administrative fees. <br />15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.