My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Admin Order 58-02-25-F
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Administrative Orders
>
2002
>
Admin Order 58-02-25-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:48:30 AM
Creation date
4/10/2009 4:24:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Admin Orders
Document_Date
3/31/2002
Document_Number
58-02-25-F
CMO_Effective_Date
5/1/2002
Author
James R. Carlson
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Finding: <br /> <br />EC 9.6710(2) establishes that a geological and geotechnical analysis can be <br />prepared by either an Oregon licensed Engineering Geologist or an Oregon <br />licensed Civil Engineer with geotechnical experience; the Rule describes <br />these two professionals under the general term "Qualified Registered <br />Professional." The Rule cannot establish standards that are more stringent <br />than the Code. Because the Code permits either an Oregon licensed <br />Engineering Geologist or an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer to fulfill the <br />requirements of EC 9.6710, the Rule cannot heighten the Code requirement <br />by requiring a Registered Professional Engineer to perform certain functions <br />and by requiring applicants to retain a certified Engineering Geologist to <br />assist with other functions. No change is being made to this provision as a <br />result of this comment. <br /> <br />Comment 16: R-9.6710-J. The Administrative Rule is unclear regarding the City's process <br />for approving other professionals that can verify subsurface conditions during <br />the construction phase for projects requiring a Level 3 analysis. <br /> <br />Fin din g: <br /> <br />R-9.6710-J has been deleted. <br /> <br />Comment 17: R-9.6710-J. It is unclear who IS allowed to retain the construction <br />verification service. <br /> <br />Finding: <br /> <br />R-9.6710-J has been deleted. <br /> <br />Comment 18: R-9.6710-J. The Administrative Rule does not provide a procedure for <br />reporting discrepancies. <br /> <br />Finding: <br /> <br />R-9.6710-J has been deleted. <br /> <br />Comment 19: Will there be a final report required on the earthwork related construction <br />when it is completed? <br /> <br />Final reports are controlled by the permitting agencies and not a requirement <br />of land use approval. The Rule is adopted pursuant to EC 9.6710, a land use <br />approval criteria. It is the professional's responsibility to guide and direct the <br />developer in what is necessary to obtain a construction permit and construct <br />a safe and structurally sound facility. Public improvement permitting and <br />construction procedures are outlined in the City's Public Improvement <br />Design Standards Manual. <br /> <br />Comment 20: Appendix A. Expressing concern about the minimum number of test holes <br />recommended in the Appendix. <br /> <br />Finding: <br /> <br />Finding: <br /> <br />Rule R-9.671 0, Appendix A has been revised to reduce the minimum number <br />of recommended test holes for land divisions. <br /> <br />Comment 21: The establishment of these standards creates a legal precedent for practice in <br />a field that relies a great deal on experience and judgment, and therefore <br />markedly increases the potential for litigation involving the practicing <br />professional and the City of Eugene. <br /> <br />Administrative Order - 4 <br />R:\ADM IN 0 RD\RU LES\03 geotech2ao. wpd(03/26/03) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.