Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Finding: <br /> <br />EC 9.6710 establishes the requirement for a geological and geotechnical <br />analysis and directs the City Manager to adopt administrative rules setting <br />forth the "standards, procedures and content" of the required analysis. <br />Further, EC 9.6710(4) establishes the general contents of each of the analysis <br />levels. Some of the code-established content requires the inclusion of <br />information that is based on the experience and judgment of the Qualified <br />Registered Professional, i.e., "recommendations for design and construction <br />techniques," and "identification of potential problems." The Rule explains, <br />specifically, what is required by the code, generally. No change is being <br />made to this provision as a result of this comment. <br /> <br />Comment 22: R-9.6710-A. The proposed Administrative Rule violates Oregon state law <br />by allowing registered geologists to practice engineering. <br /> <br />Finding: <br /> <br />EC 9.6710(2) establishes that the geological and geotechnical analysis can be <br />prepared by an Oregon licensed Engineering Geologist or an Oregon licensed <br />Civil Engineer with geotechnical experience. EC 9.6710(4) establishes the <br />three categories/levels of analysis and, generally, the content of each level of <br />analysis. The Rule simply sets forth the acceptable methods to be used for <br />investigating and reporting the geological and geotechnical site investigations <br />for levels and consistency of analysis established by the code. A Qualified <br />Registered Professional must always comply with Oregon Revised Statutes <br />Chapter 672; neither the Rule or the Code eliminates this state law <br />requirement. No change is being made to this provision as a result of this <br />comment. <br /> <br />Comment 23: R-9.6710-G.2.3. There is no analytical method that allows someone to make <br />reasonable determinations, evaluations, or expectations concerning <br />consolidation or settlement based on a "visual manual estimate" of the soils. <br /> <br />Finding: <br /> <br />Visual manual estimates represent the professional's observation of the soils <br />and are the foundation for their decision to complete additional testing to <br />determine consolidation or settlement risks. No change is being made to this <br />provision as a result of this comment. <br /> <br />Comment 24: The proposed Administrative Rule develops a standard of practice that will <br />have legal implications burdensome to both the City and the consulting <br />community. <br /> <br />Finding: <br /> <br />Eugene Code Section 9.6710 establishes the geological and geotechnical <br />analysis requirement. Further, EC 9.6710(4) sets forth the three <br />categories/levels of geological and geotechnical analysis and the general <br />required contents of each analysis level. Because this comment does not <br />specifically identify which of the Rule provisions will have potential "legal <br />implications burdensome" to the City and the Community the comment <br />cannot be responded to further. No change is being made to the Rule as a <br />result of this comment. <br /> <br />Comment 25: Is the National Resources Conservation Services soil manual the same as the <br />Soil Survey for Lane County? <br /> <br />Administrative Order - 5 <br />R:\ADMINORD\RULES\03geotech2ao. wpd(03/26/03) <br />